IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i9-10p1365-1371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models to enhance research capacity and capability in clinical nurses: a narrative review

Author

Listed:
  • Louise O’Byrne
  • Sheree Smith

Abstract

Aim. To identify models used as local initiatives to build capability and capacity in clinical nurses. Background. The National Health Service, Nursing and Midwifery Council and the United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration all support the development of the building of research capability and capacity in clinical nurses in the UK. Design. Narrative review. Methods. A literature search of databases (including Medline and Pubmed) using the search terms nursing research, research capacity and research capability combined with building, development, model and collaboration. Publications which included a description or methodological study of a structured initiative to tackle research capacity and capability development in clinical nurses were selected. Results. Three models were found to be dominant in the literature. These comprised evidence‐based practice, facilitative and experiential learning models. Strong leadership, organisational need and support management were elements found in all three models. Methodological issues were evident and pertain to small sample sizes, inconsistent and poorly defined outcomes along with a lack of data. Conclusions. Whilst the vision of a research ready and active National Health Service is to be applauded to date, there appears to be limited research on the best approach to support local initiatives for nurses that build research capability and capacity. Future studies will need to focus on well‐defined objectives and outcomes to enable robust evidence to support local initiatives. Relevance to clinical practice. To build research capability and capacity in clinical nurses, there is a need to evaluate models and determine the best approach that will provide clinical nurses with research opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise O’Byrne & Sheree Smith, 2011. "Models to enhance research capacity and capability in clinical nurses: a narrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1365-1371, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1365-1371
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03282.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03282.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03282.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lona Roll & Kristin Stegenga & Verna Hendricks-Ferguson & Yvonne J. Barnes & Brooke Cherven & Sharron L. Docherty & Sheri L. Robb & Joan E. Haase, 2013. "Engaging Nurses in Research for a Randomized Clinical Trial of a Behavioral Health Intervention," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-6, September.
    2. Natalie Bradford & Shirley Chambers & Adrienne Hudson & Jacqui Jauncey‐Cooke & Robyn Penny & Carol Windsor & Patsy Yates, 2019. "Evaluation frameworks in health services: An integrative review of use, attributes and elements," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2486-2498, July.
    3. Qirong Chen & Dan Liu & Chuyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang, 2020. "Relationship between critical thinking disposition and research competence among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1332-1340, April.
    4. Sylvie Robichaud‐Ekstrand, 2016. "New Brunswick nurses' views on nursing research, and factors influencing their research activities in clinical practice," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), pages 246-255, June.
    5. Arja Häggman‐Laitila & Lea‐Riitta Mattila & Hanna‐Leena Melender, 2017. "A systematic review of the outcomes of educational interventions relevant to nurses with simultaneous strategies for guideline implementation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 320-340, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1365-1371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.