IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i9-10p1255-1263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring health‐related quality of life in non‐complicated diabetes patients may be an effective parameter to assess patients at risk of a more serious disease course: a cross‐sectional study of two diabetes outpatient groups

Author

Listed:
  • Lars‐Petter Jelsness‐Jørgensen
  • Lis Ribu
  • Tomm Bernklev
  • Bjørn Allan Moum

Abstract

Aim. To describe health‐related quality of life in diabetes outpatients and investigate the impact of diabetic foot ulcers, by comparing a group of patients with and without diabetic foot ulcers complications. Secondary to study the impact of sociodemographic and clinical variables in the two groups. Design. Cross‐sectional study. Methods. The study involved 130 diabetes outpatients and 127 diabetic foot ulcers patients. Health‐related quality of life was measured with the generic questionnaire Short Form‐36, consisting of eight dimensional scores. All scores were adjusted for differences in age and gender (estimated marginal means). Differences were compared with anova calculations, by the use of Predictive Analytics Software, pasw (version 17.0). Results. This study confirms that health‐related quality of life differs significantly between disease subgroups when measured with Short Form‐36. Diabetic foot ulcers had a major negative impact on 7/8 subscales on the Short Form‐36 compared to the diabetes outpatients group. health‐related quality of life decreased with increasing amount of complications and comorbidity in the diabetes outpatients group, with cardiovascular complications being the most pronounced predictor of lower health‐related quality of life scores. Conclusion. Patients who have developed diabetic foot ulcers reports much poorer health‐related quality of life than compared to diabetes outpatients. Factors linked to the development of late complications were not detected in the diabetic foot ulcers group, such as cardiovascular comorbidity and neuropathy. Relevance to clinical practice. Health‐related quality of life measurement in early stages of disease may detect patients at risk of a more serious disease course and who consequently are in need of a more intensive follow‐up.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars‐Petter Jelsness‐Jørgensen & Lis Ribu & Tomm Bernklev & Bjørn Allan Moum, 2011. "Measuring health‐related quality of life in non‐complicated diabetes patients may be an effective parameter to assess patients at risk of a more serious disease course: a cross‐sectional study of two ," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1255-1263, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1255-1263
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03554.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03554.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03554.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:9-10:p:1255-1263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.