IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i5-6p873-881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing nursing practice: redefining the theoretical and practical integration of knowledge

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Christensen

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this paper is to offer an alternative knowing‐how knowing‐that framework of nursing knowledge, which in the past has been accepted as the provenance of advanced practice. Background. The concept of advancing practice is central to the development of nursing practice and has been seen to take on many different forms depending on its use in context. To many it has become synonymous with the work of the advanced or expert practitioner; others have viewed it as a process of continuing professional development and skills acquisition. Moreover, it is becoming closely linked with practice development. However, there is much discussion as to what constitutes the knowledge necessary for advancing and advanced practice, and it has been suggested that theoretical and practical knowledge form the cornerstone of advanced knowledge. Design. The design of this article takes a discursive approach as to the meaning and integration of knowledge within the context of advancing nursing practice. Method. A thematic analysis of the current discourse relating to knowledge integration models in an advancing and advanced practice arena was used to identify concurrent themes relating to the knowing‐how knowing‐that framework which commonly used to classify the knowledge necessary for advanced nursing practice. Conclusion. There is a dichotomy as to what constitutes knowledge for advanced and advancing practice. Several authors have offered a variety of differing models, yet it is the application and integration of theoretical and practical knowledge that defines and develops the advancement of nursing practice. An alternative framework offered here may allow differences in the way that nursing knowledge important for advancing practice is perceived, developed and coordinated. Relevance to clinical practice. What has inevitably been neglected is that there are various other variables which when transposed into the existing knowing‐how knowing‐that framework allows for advanced knowledge to be better defined. One of the more notable variables is pattern recognition, which became the focus of Benner’s work on expert practice. Therefore, if this is included into the knowing‐how knowing‐that framework, the knowing‐how becomes the knowledge that contributes to advancing and advanced practice and the knowing‐that becomes the governing action based on a deeper understanding of the problem or issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Christensen, 2011. "Advancing nursing practice: redefining the theoretical and practical integration of knowledge," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 873-881, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:873-881
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03392.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03392.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03392.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen Franks, 2014. "The contribution of nurse consultants in England to the public health leadership agenda," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3434-3448, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:5-6:p:873-881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.