IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i3-4p305-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of the effects of warmed irrigation fluid on core body temperature during endoscopic surgeries

Author

Listed:
  • Yinghui Jin
  • Jinhui Tian
  • Mei Sun
  • Kehu Yang

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The purpose of this systematic review was to establish whether warmed irrigation fluid temperature could decrease the drop of body temperature and incidence of shivering and hypothermia. Background. Irrigation fluid, which is used in large quantities during endoscopic surgeries at room temperature, is considered to be associated with hypothermia and shivering. It remains controversial whether using warmed irrigation fluid to replace room‐temperature irrigation fluid will decrease the drop of core body temperature and the occurrence of hypothermia. Design. A comprehensive search (computerised database searches, footnote chasing, citation chasing) was undertaken to identify all the randomised controlled trials that explored temperature of irrigation fluid in endoscopic surgery. An approach involving meta‐analysis was used. Method. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCI, China academic journals full‐text databases, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese scientific journals databases and Chinese Medical Association Journals for trials that meet the inclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed using standards recommended by Cochrane Library Handbook 5.0.1. Disagreement was resolved by consensus. Results. Thirteen randomised controlled trials including 686 patients were identified. The results showed that room‐temperature irrigation fluid caused a greater drop of core body temperature in patients, compared to warmed irrigation fluid (p

Suggested Citation

  • Yinghui Jin & Jinhui Tian & Mei Sun & Kehu Yang, 2011. "A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of the effects of warmed irrigation fluid on core body temperature during endoscopic surgeries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3‐4), pages 305-316, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:305-316
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03484.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03484.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03484.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:3-4:p:305-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.