IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i17-18p2425-2435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Registered nurses’ thinking strategies on malnutrition and pressure ulcers in nursing homes: a scenario‐based think‐aloud study

Author

Listed:
  • Mariann Fossum
  • Gregory L Alexander
  • Katarina E Göransson
  • Margareta Ehnfors
  • Anna Ehrenberg

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to explore the thinking strategies and clinical reasoning processes registered nurses use during simulated care planning for malnutrition and pressure ulcers in nursing home care. Background. Clinical reasoning is an essential component of nursing practice. Registered nurses’ thinking strategies and clinical reasoning have received limited attention in nursing science. Further research is needed to understand registered nurses’ clinical reasoning, especially for prevention of malnutrition and pressure ulcers as they are important quality indicators of resident care in nursing homes. Design. A qualitative explorative design was used with a think‐aloud interview technique. Methods. The transcribed verbalisations were analysed with qualitative deductive content analysis. Data were collected during six months in 2007–2008 from 30 registered nurses at nine nursing homes in Norway. Results. The registered nurses used a variety of thinking strategies, but there were differences in the frequency of use of the different strategies. The three most commonly used thinking strategies were ‘making choices’, ‘forming relationships’ and ‘drawing conclusions’. None of the nurses performed a structured risk assessment of malnutrition or pressure ulcers. Registered nurses started with assessing data from the scenarios, but after a short and elementary assessment they moved directly to planning. Conclusion. Many different thinking strategies were used in registered nurses’ clinical reasoning for prevention of malnutrition and pressure ulcers. The thinking strategy ‘making choices’ was most commonly used and registered nurses’ main focus in their reasoning was on planning nursing interventions. Relevance to clinical practice. This study showed that most of the registered nurses go directly to planning when reasoning clinically about residents in nursing homes. A lack of systematic risk assessments was identified. The insight gained from this study can be used to recommend improvements in tools designed for nursing homes to support the registered nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariann Fossum & Gregory L Alexander & Katarina E Göransson & Margareta Ehnfors & Anna Ehrenberg, 2011. "Registered nurses’ thinking strategies on malnutrition and pressure ulcers in nursing homes: a scenario‐based think‐aloud study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(17‐18), pages 2425-2435, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2425-2435
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03578.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03578.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03578.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:17-18:p:2425-2435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.