IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v20y2011i15-16p2315-2324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Same… same but different: expectations of graduates from two midwifery education courses in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Athena Hammond
  • Joanne Gray
  • Rachel Smith
  • Jennifer Fenwick
  • Caroline SE Homer

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To identify the expectations and workforce intentions of new graduate midwives from two different pre‐registration educational courses at one Australian university. Background. In Australia there are two different educational pathways to midwifery qualification, one offered for registered nurses, commonly at a postgraduate level and the other for non‐nurses, at an undergraduate level. The knowledge about midwifery graduates in general is reasonably limited and there is no specific research that examines the similarities and differences between graduates from the two different courses. Design. A cross‐sectional design was used. Method. Data were collected by questionnaire from both undergraduate and postgraduate midwifery graduates in 2007 and 2008 at one Australian university. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results. Almost all the graduates from the two different pre‐registration courses intended to enter the midwifery workforce with both groups rating the factors that influenced this decision similarly. There were, however, significant differences in graduates age and their intention to work part time. Their views of their ideal roles and subsequent uptake into formal new graduate transition programmes differed. Graduates from the two courses also reported philosophical differences regarding their concepts of job satisfaction and ways their jobs could be improved. Conclusions. The graduates from the two different courses showed sufficient significant differences to warrant consideration in current workforce planning for midwifery. Relevance to clinical practice. The factors that influence the career decisions of new graduate midwives can positively impact educational and workforce planning. The findings may be able to help inform strategies to address turnover and attrition in midwifery.

Suggested Citation

  • Athena Hammond & Joanne Gray & Rachel Smith & Jennifer Fenwick & Caroline SE Homer, 2011. "Same… same but different: expectations of graduates from two midwifery education courses in Australia," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(15‐16), pages 2315-2324, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:15-16:p:2315-2324
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03774.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03774.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03774.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:20:y:2011:i:15-16:p:2315-2324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.