IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i5-6p847-855.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of the psychological well‐being and care of older home care clients: clients and their carers

Author

Listed:
  • Sini Eloranta
  • Seija Arve
  • Hannu Isoaho
  • Anthony Welch
  • Matti Viitanen
  • Pirkko Routasalo

Abstract

Aim. To explore and compare older home care clients’ (65+) and their professionals’ perceptions of the clients’ psychological well‐being and care and to identify possible differences in these perceptions. Background. Psychological well‐being is considered an important dimension of quality of life. With advancing age, older people require home care support to be able to remain in their own home. The main goal of care is to maximise their independence and quality of life. Design. Descriptive, survey design with questionnaire. Methods. A postal questionnaire was distributed to 200 older home care clients and 570 social and health care professionals in 2007. The total response rate was 63%. The questionnaire consisted of questions about clients’ psychological well‐being and the provision of care by home care professionals. The differences in responses between clients and professionals were analysed using cross‐tabulations, the Pearson Chi‐Square Test and Fisher’s Exact Tests. Results. The professional group believed that their clients did not have plans for the future. They believed that their clients felt themselves depressed and suffering from loneliness significantly more often than the client group did. The client group were also significantly more critical of the care (motivating independent actions, physical, psychological and social care) they got from the professional group than how the professionals evaluated the care they gave. Conclusions. To be able to support older clients to continue living at home, professionals need to provide a service that meets client’s own perceptions and complex social and health care needs as well as personal sense of well‐being. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings offer useful insights for the professional in planning and delivering appropriate home care services. A better understanding of differences between clients’ and professionals’ perceptions could lead to a better individualised care outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Sini Eloranta & Seija Arve & Hannu Isoaho & Anthony Welch & Matti Viitanen & Pirkko Routasalo, 2010. "Perceptions of the psychological well‐being and care of older home care clients: clients and their carers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 847-855, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:847-855
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02994.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02994.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02994.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:5-6:p:847-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.