IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i3-4p564-573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting the health of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patients’ and carers’ views

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Caress
  • Karen Luker
  • Karen Chalmers

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of this study was to generate in‐depth insights into patients’ and family members’ understanding of the causation, progression and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the role of health promotion with this population. In particular, we were interested in identifying the ways patients and family members considered that they could maximise their (patients’) health, in the presence of this disease. Background. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is highly prevalent and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, impacting on quality of life and healthcare expenditure. Health promotion is, therefore, an important consideration. There are few examples in the literature of health promotion programmes for this population, including those directed at smoking cessation, which also focus on the family or significant others. Design. An exploratory, descriptive design was employed. Method. Semi‐structured, audio‐recorded interviews were conducted with 14 patients and 12 family caregivers. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using content analysis procedures which captured the meaning of the data. Results. The three main themes were ‘health promotion: what’s that?’, ‘community resources for health promotion’ and ‘it wasn’t just the smoking’. Many participants seemed unaware that their health might benefit from a healthier life style and provided little spontaneous information on any activities they carried out to maintain or improve their health. Conclusions. This study highlighted a dearth of health promoting activity amongst people affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The reality for most patients was to manage the day‐to‐day demands that the symptoms of the disease imposed on them. Our data suggest that a more wide‐ranging approach, encompassing aspects of health promotion, might be welcomed by many patients and their family carers. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings from this study highlight gaps in patients’ and carers’ understanding of the potential role of health promotion in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and areas for intervention by health professionals. With the increase in smoking rates of women and predicted future increases in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, it is imperative that health professionals find effective ways to provide support and health promotive care for patients and families.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Caress & Karen Luker & Karen Chalmers, 2010. "Promoting the health of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patients’ and carers’ views," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 564-573, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:564-573
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02982.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02982.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02982.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Harris, 2010. "Commentary on Caress A, Luker K & Chalmers K (2010) Promoting the health of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: patients’ and carers’ views. Journal of Clinical Nursing 19, 564–573," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(17‐18), pages 2664-2665, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:564-573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.