IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i3-4p440-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical profile of patients enroled in a cell therapy trial for severe coronary artery disease

Author

Listed:
  • Sara MG Brandão
  • Isolmar T Schettert
  • Luiz AM César
  • José E Krieger
  • Sérgio A De Oliveira
  • Noedir AG Stolf
  • Luís HW Gowdak

Abstract

Aims and objectives. To compare the clinical profile of patients included in a clinical trial of autologous bone marrow cells as an adjunctive therapy to coronary artery bypass grafting with that of patients undergoing routine coronary artery bypass grafting. Background. The therapeutic potential of autologous bone marrow cells has been explored in the treatment of severe coronary artery disease. There are few data regarding the clinical and socio‐economic profile of patients included in clinical trials using bone marrow cell. Design. Case–control study. Method. Sixty‐seven patients (61 SD 9) years, 82% men) with multivessel coronary artery disease were divided into two groups: patients in the bone marrow cell group (n = 34) underwent incomplete coronary artery bypass grafting + intramyocardial injection of autologous bone marrow cells (lymphomonocytic fraction −2·0 (SD 0·2 × 108) cells/patient) in the ischaemic, non‐revascularised myocardium, whereas patients in the coronary artery bypass grafting group (n = 33) underwent routine bypass surgery. Demographics, socio‐economic status, clinical and echocardiographic data were collected. Statistical analysis included the Fisher’s exact test (categorical variables) and the Student’s t‐test (continuous variables). Results. There were no significant differences between groups regarding age, gender, BMI, heart rate, blood pressure and echo data. There was a greater prevalence of obesity (65 vs. 33%; OR = 3·7 [1·3–10·1]), of previous myocardial infarction (68 vs. 39%; OR = 3·2 [1·2–8·8]) and prior revascularisation procedures (59 vs. 24%; OR = 4·5 [1·6–12·7]) in the autologous bone marrow cells group and of smokers in the coronary artery bypass grafting group (51 vs. 23%; OR = 3·5 [1·2–10·4]). Conclusions. Patients included in this clinical trial of autologous bone marrow cells for severe coronary artery disease presented a greater prevalence of myocardial revascularisation procedures, indicating a more severe clinical presentation of the disease. Fewer smokers in this group could be attributable to life style changes after previous cardiovascular events and/or interventions. Relevance to clinical practice. The knowledge of the clinical profile of patients included in cell therapy trials may help researchers in the identification of patients that may be enroled in future clinical trials of this new therapeutic strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara MG Brandão & Isolmar T Schettert & Luiz AM César & José E Krieger & Sérgio A De Oliveira & Noedir AG Stolf & Luís HW Gowdak, 2010. "Clinical profile of patients enroled in a cell therapy trial for severe coronary artery disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 440-446, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:440-446
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03045.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03045.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03045.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:3-4:p:440-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.