IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i11-12p1510-1518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic accuracy of two pressure ulcer risk scales and a generic nursing assessment tool. A psychometric comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Antje Tannen
  • Katrin Balzer
  • Jan Kottner
  • Theo Dassen
  • Ruud Halfens
  • Elke Mertens

Abstract

Aim. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of two pressure ulcer risk assessment scales and one generic nursing assessment tool. Background. Guidelines for pressure ulcer prevention recommend an initial risk screening of all patients, followed by appropriate nursing interventions. Additionally, personal and financial resources have to be allocated carefully to avoid excessive or too little treatment. Risk assessments should be accurate and applicable, and some studies showed that generic nursing tools also provide specific information for nursing diagnoses, like risk for pressure ulcer. Design. Cross sectional observational study. Methods. A total of 1053 adult patients of a university hospital in Germany were investigated. For each patient, the Braden Scale, the Waterlow Scale and the Care Dependency Scale were completed. A skin inspection was conducted by trained nurses. Correlations between the three scales and the mean values of each pressure ulcer risk assessment scales for each Care Dependency Scale value were calculated. To determine the association between susceptibility to pressure ulcer and observed pressure ulcer, the area under the curve was calculated. Results. There was a higher correlation between the Braden Scale and the Care Dependency Scale (r = 0·82) than between the two pressure ulcer risk assessment scales (−0·65). The highest area under the curve was reached by the Braden Scale (0·86), followed by the Care Dependency Scale (0·83) and the Waterlow Scale (0·81). Only the Braden Scale (cut‐off 18) and the Care Dependency Scale (cut‐off 65) reached the psychometric requirements of at least 70% sensitivity and 70% specificity. Conclusions. The Care Dependency Scale could be used for both a general nursing assessment and as a screening tool for risk for pressure ulcers. The Braden Scale showed the highest association with the occurrence of pressure ulcer. Relevance to clinical practice. The Care Dependency Scale is a useful screening tool to identify patients at risk for pressure ulcers. Nursing assessment activities might be reduced by using a generic nursing assessment tool also for specific risk screening.

Suggested Citation

  • Antje Tannen & Katrin Balzer & Jan Kottner & Theo Dassen & Ruud Halfens & Elke Mertens, 2010. "Diagnostic accuracy of two pressure ulcer risk scales and a generic nursing assessment tool. A psychometric comparison," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1510-1518, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1510-1518
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03005.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03005.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03005.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1510-1518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.