IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i11-12p1504-1509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increasing pressure ulcer rates and changes in delivery of care: a retrospective analysis at a University Clinic

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen Stausberg
  • Nils Lehmann
  • Knut Kröger
  • Irene Maier
  • Helmut Schneider
  • Wolfgang Niebel
  • for the interdisciplinary decubitus project

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the relation between pressure ulcers and delivery of care. Background. No decrease of pressure ulcer rates could be recognised in acute hospital care, despite intensive efforts in prevention. Furthermore, reports show increasing rates. Design. Retrospective analysis of hospital data. Methods. The study included all inpatients from year 1 (2003/2004) and 4 (2006/2007) of the interdisciplinary decubitus project. Information on ulcers was recorded at admission, discharge and in case of new events. We analysed the effect of age, length of stay, operation and intensive care episode. In logistic regression, we used the existence of ulcers and the appearance of new ulcers as dependent variables. Results. Parallel to a decrease in the number of inpatients, age, length of stay and operation frequency rose between 2003 and 2007. Higher age, longer length of stay, operation, intensive care episode and year 4 raise the odds for ulcers in univariate and with exception of operation in multivariate analyses. With exception of operation and year 4, the same variables raise the odds for new ulcers, too. Conclusions. The increase of pressure ulcer frequency could be related to changes in delivery of care. The adverse event pressure ulcer will become more important in hospital care. Relevance to clinical practice. There is no decrease in pressure ulcer rates, albeit enormous efforts in prevention. Hospital care has been facing changes in case mix. Age, length of stay and intensive care episodes are related to increasing ulcer rates at a University Clinic. Nursing management has to be aware of additional workload for pressure ulcer management in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Stausberg & Nils Lehmann & Knut Kröger & Irene Maier & Helmut Schneider & Wolfgang Niebel & for the interdisciplinary decubitus project, 2010. "Increasing pressure ulcer rates and changes in delivery of care: a retrospective analysis at a University Clinic," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1504-1509, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1504-1509
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03231.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03231.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03231.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wookjin Lee & Byeong Hee Won & Seong Wook Cho, 2017. "Finite element modeling for predicting the contact pressure between a foam mattress and the human body in a supine position," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 104-117, January.
    2. Li Zhi RN & Chang Lin, 2019. "A Review on Perioperative Pressure Ulcers," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 21(5), pages 16220-16224, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:11-12:p:1504-1509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.