IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v19y2010i1-2p183-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wise women: mentoring as relational learning in perinatal nursing practice

Author

Listed:
  • Annette Ryan
  • Lisa Goldberg
  • Joan Evans

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The focus of this paper is on one of four themes from a study exploring mentoring relationships between nurses in the intrapartum setting. The theme, relational learning, highlights how perinatal nurses engage with each other and engage with birthing women on a journey of learning in perinatal nursing practice. Background. Few studies have explored the contextual, lived experiences of informal mentoring relationships within nursing, particularly within perinatal nursing. Design. A qualitative feminist phenomenological study that considered a gender‐centred, embodied exploration of human lived experiences was conducted. Method. Five registered nurses practicing on a tertiary level labour and delivery unit in eastern Canada were purposefully recruited. Data were collected by phenomenological interviews, practice observations in the clinical setting and reflective journaling. Results. Four themes emerged through thematic analysis and researcher interpretation: the meaning of nurse‐to‐nurse mentoring, mentoring as relational learning, mentoring as embodied learning and a contextual understanding of nurse‐to‐nurse mentoring. Relational learning came to be understood through feminist phenomenological analysis, which revealed that expert perinatal nursing knowledge develops within positive mentoring relationships between perinatal nurses practicing with birthing women. This learning extends beyond tasks to a holistic understanding of clinical situations within specific health and social contexts. The mentor models positive perinatal nursing practices and creates a sense of enthusiasm that harnesses the raw passion new nurses often have for practice. Conclusion. The findings in this study aim to promote the understanding of the importance of relational, experiential learning for perinatal nurses’ professional development. Relevance to clinical practice. The results from this study will encourage nurses and nurse leaders to support mentoring by providing adequate resources and positive feedback for mentoring relationships. This will foster and sustain expert nurses to support novice nurses in perinatal practice. The findings also offer insight for perinatal practices beyond nursing, including midwifery.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette Ryan & Lisa Goldberg & Joan Evans, 2010. "Wise women: mentoring as relational learning in perinatal nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1‐2), pages 183-191, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:1-2:p:183-191
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02852.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02852.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02852.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Regina L. Hale & Carolyn A. Phillips, 2019. "Mentoring up: A grounded theory of nurse‐to‐nurse mentoring," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 159-172, January.
    2. Darlaine Jantzen, 2019. "Refining nursing practice through workplace learning: A grounded theory," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2565-2576, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:19:y:2010:i:1-2:p:183-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.