IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v15y2006i2p178-187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of technological equipment in critical care units: nurses’ perceptions in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis Kiekkas
  • Maria Karga
  • Maria Poulopoulou
  • Irini Karpouhtsi
  • Vasileios Papadoulas
  • Constantinos Koutsojannis

Abstract

Aims and objectives. The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of nurses who work in critical care units about positive and negative effects related to the use of technological equipment and identify relationships between these perceptions and demographic characteristics of participants. Background. Previous researchers have investigated the perceptions of nursing personnel about the effects of technology on clinical practice. However, most of them focus on specific negative effects. Positive and negative effects have never been studied as a whole. Design. Critical care nurses were surveyed to elicit their perceptions regarding the use of technological equipment. The instrument comprised a 14‐item questionnaire and a series of demographic characteristics. A five‐point Likert scale was used for each of these 14 questions. Methods. The questionnaire was administered to 122 nurses working at the four critical care units of a major academic hospital in Patras, Greece, from 1/10/2003 to 31/12/2003. The completion of the questionnaires was achieved by means of a personal interview. Results. A total of 118 questionnaires were completed. The majority of nurses recognized the positive effects of equipment regarding patient care and clinical practice. At the same time, they agreed that use of equipment possibly leads to increased risk due to human errors or mechanical faults, increased stress and restricted autonomy of nursing personnel. Conclusions. The use of machines does not add to nursing prestige and this may be related to decreased autonomy. Human errors, mechanical faults and increased stress do not seem to come as a result of time constriction but rather of inadequate education. Undergraduate and continuing education should respond efficiently to the needs of contemporary critical care. Relevance to clinical practice. Recognition of positive and negative effects of machines through the investigation of perceptions of nurses is the first step before looking for ways of maximizing advantages and facing disadvantages of equipment use.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis Kiekkas & Maria Karga & Maria Poulopoulou & Irini Karpouhtsi & Vasileios Papadoulas & Constantinos Koutsojannis, 2006. "Use of technological equipment in critical care units: nurses’ perceptions in Greece," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 178-187, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:178-187
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01243.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01243.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01243.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:15:y:2006:i:2:p:178-187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.