IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v22y2010i8p1102-1114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the child's best interests? Legislation on children's work in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Kate Orkin

Abstract

An abolitionist approach to children's work bans all work; a regulatory approach bans harmful work and regulates other work. I argue for a regulatory approach, using the ‘least restrictive’ alternative test applied in law. I contend, however, that definitions of harmful work must be appropriate to local contexts and informed by working children's views. I support this with a case study of a village in Ethiopia where the current abolitionist approach is overly restrictive. However, a regulatory approach based on international definitions of harmful work would probably not protect children in the case study village against some harmful work. Children and parents in the village are able to define harmful work more precisely than international definitions, suggesting that locally specific definitions developed with working children should form the basis of regulatory legislation. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate Orkin, 2010. "In the child's best interests? Legislation on children's work in Ethiopia," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(8), pages 1102-1114, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:22:y:2010:i:8:p:1102-1114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jid.1749
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dendir, Seife, 2014. "Children's cognitive ability, schooling and work: Evidence from Ethiopia," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 22-36.
    2. Eskander Alvi & Seife Dendir, 2015. "Parental Education and Children's School and Work Status in Urban Ethiopia: A Note on Gender Bias," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 83(1), pages 101-116, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:22:y:2010:i:8:p:1102-1114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.