IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jfutmk/v35y2015i8p738-752.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price‐to‐Earnings Ratios and Option Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Ansley Chua
  • R. Jared DeLisle
  • Sze‐Shiang Feng
  • Bong Soo Lee

Abstract

In May of 1997, in the midst of the Internet bubble, the average month end P/E ratio for the software industry was 44. However, the 5‐year historical average was 31. In this study, we examine the effect of this industry value fluctuation on the effects of option prices. We examine the relationship between the level of relative valuation and option pricing via deviations in put‐call parity and a two‐factor option pricing model incorporating relative valuation. We find support that the increase in relative industry valuation Granger causes put‐call parity deviations, implying investors price options with greater expectation of downward movement. Additionally, we develop a model and find support that the two‐factor option pricing model that incorporates relative industry valuation prices options better than the standard Black–Scholes (1973) model. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 35:738–752, 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Ansley Chua & R. Jared DeLisle & Sze‐Shiang Feng & Bong Soo Lee, 2015. "Price‐to‐Earnings Ratios and Option Prices," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(8), pages 738-752, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:35:y:2015:i:8:p:738-752
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Huiming & Watada, Junzo, 2019. "An analysis of the arbitrage efficiency of the Chinese SSE 50ETF options market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 474-489.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jfutmk:v:35:y:2015:i:8:p:738-752. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.