IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v59y2006i4p91-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design limitations of long‐term care insurance schemes: A comparative study of the situation in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Joan Costa‐Font
  • Montserrat Font‐Vilalta

Abstract

Social and demographic changes are gradually transforming the way Western societies cope with old‐age dependency, in particular the provision of long‐term care (LTC). In response to the need for formal care services and financing instruments, this study examines a range of both private and public insurance tools. As a general rule, LTC insurance is markedly underdeveloped. Furthermore, in southern European countries, the role of the public sector in LTC is unclear compared with its role in other, related welfare areas such as healthcare. The study examines the financing alternatives for LTC insurance, taking as its benchmark the Spanish LTC financing reform. It briefly examines some existing, publicly funded LTC financing tools and explores the potential role of private LTC insurance, arguing that it has an active part to play alongside compulsory mainstream insurance schemes and self‐insurance alternatives. As in other European countries, Spanish social attitudes show a preference for some kind of general entitlement to publicly funded schemes, although this preference is subject to significant regional heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Costa‐Font & Montserrat Font‐Vilalta, 2006. "Design limitations of long‐term care insurance schemes: A comparative study of the situation in Spain," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(4), pages 91-110, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:59:y:2006:i:4:p:91-110
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2006.00255.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2006.00255.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2006.00255.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:59:y:2006:i:4:p:91-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.