IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/intssr/v54y2001i4p49-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rate of return guarantees for mandatory defined contribution plans

Author

Listed:
  • John A. Turner
  • David M. Rajnes

Abstract

Many mandatory defined contribution systems provide a rate of return guarantee. The guarantees provided have generally been backed by a sequential combination of two or more of six different financing sources. Those sources are (1) reserve funds established within the pension fund, using investment earnings on the fund; (2) reserve funds established using funds provided by the owners of the pension fund management companies; (3) a defined benefit plan associated with the defined contribution plan; (4) central guarantee funds financed by contributions from pension funds; (5) funds provided by employers; and (6) the government. Nearly all the guarantees are first backed by a limited liability guarantee derived from investment earnings that would otherwise accrue to workers. In some instances, the guarantee may be funded by employers. Then they are backed by a guarantee financed by capital market institutions — pension fund managers directly or a central guarantee fund. Lastly, they are backed by an unfunded governmental guarantee with unlimited liability that is contingent on the insufficiency of private sector guarantees.

Suggested Citation

  • John A. Turner & David M. Rajnes, 2001. "Rate of return guarantees for mandatory defined contribution plans," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 49-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:54:y:2001:i:4:p:49-66
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-246X.t01-1-00104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-246X.t01-1-00104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-246X.t01-1-00104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedraza, Alvaro & Pulga, Fredy, 2019. "Asset price effects of peer benchmarking: Evidence from a natural experiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 53-65.
    2. Morales, Alvaro Pedraza, 2014. "Strategic interactions and portfolio choice in money management : evidence from Colombian pension funds," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6994, The World Bank.
    3. Sule Sahin & Adem Yavuz Elveren, 2009. "A Cost Analysis of a Minimum Pension Guarantee for the Individual Pension System in Turkey," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2009_13, University of Utah, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:intssr:v:54:y:2001:i:4:p:49-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1865-1674 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.