IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/injsow/v27y2018i3p258-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextualising institutional complementarity. How long‐term unemployment depends on employment protection legislation, active labour market policies and the economic climate

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Benda
  • Ferry Koster
  • Romke van der Veen

Abstract

This study investigated if and how active labour market policies (ALMPs) and employment protection interact with each other in light of long‐term unemployment reduction. We argue that how well the interaction between both labour market institutions reduces long‐term unemployment depends on the level of economic growth. To improve analytical clarity, two types of ALMPs were differentiated, namely training and employment programmes. Using data on 20 European countries over 16 years, our results suggest that employment protection moderates the relationship between employment programmes and long‐term unemployment. The combination of high spending on employment programmes and less strict employment protection is associated with less long‐term unemployment. This moderation effect is stronger during an economic downturn. A moderation effect from employment protection on the relationship between training programmes and long‐term unemployment was not found, even when the economic climate was taken into account as a contextual factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Benda & Ferry Koster & Romke van der Veen, 2018. "Contextualising institutional complementarity. How long‐term unemployment depends on employment protection legislation, active labour market policies and the economic climate," International Journal of Social Welfare, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 258-269, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:injsow:v:27:y:2018:i:3:p:258-269
    DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12307
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ijsw.12307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:injsow:v:27:y:2018:i:3:p:258-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2397 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.