IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v4y1995i5p383-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are guidelines for peer‐reviewing economic evaluations necessary? A survey of current editorial practice

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Jefferson
  • Vittorio Demicheli

Abstract

We report the results of a postal survey of 150 editors of medical journals aimed at assessing editorial policy on peer‐review of economic studies. 70 editors (47%) responded to the anonymous questionnaire which contained six questions. 16 (23% or respondents) claimed to have an editorial policy, most claiming acceptance of ‘good evaluations’. Few (36%) had trained economists as referees and none had criteria or guidelines for peer‐reviewing economic studies. This situation helps to explain the variable quality of international economic literature. There is an urgent need to produce internationally accepted sets of guidelines for authors, editors and peer‐reviewers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Jefferson & Vittorio Demicheli, 1995. "Are guidelines for peer‐reviewing economic evaluations necessary? A survey of current editorial practice," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(5), pages 383-388, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:4:y:1995:i:5:p:383-388
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4730040504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4730040504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4730040504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Jefferson & Vittorio Demicheli, 1994. "Is vaccination against hepatitis b efficient? A review of world literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(1), pages 25-37, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Jefferson & Miranda Mugford & Alastair Gray & Vittorio Demicheli, 1996. "An exercise on the feasibility of carrying out secondary economic analyses," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 155-165, March.
    2. Damian Walker & Julia A. Fox‐Rushby, 2000. "Economic evaluation of communicable disease interventions in developing countries: a critical review of the published literature," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(8), pages 681-698, December.
    3. Francis Pang & Mike Drummond & Fujian Song, 1999. "The use of meta-analysis in economic evaluation," Working Papers 173chedp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    4. K Cooper & S C Brailsford & R Davies, 2007. "Choice of modelling technique for evaluating health care interventions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(2), pages 168-176, February.
    5. Philippe Beutels, 2001. "Economic evaluations of hepatitis B immunization: a global review of recent studies (1994–2000)," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(8), pages 751-774, December.
    6. Tom Jefferson & Miranda Mugford & Vittorio Demicheli, 1994. "Qaly league tables," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 3(3), pages 205-205, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:4:y:1995:i:5:p:383-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.