IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v33y2024i5p823-843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do hospitals respond to payment unbundling for diagnostic imaging of suspected cancer patients?

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Hayes
  • Jonathan Stokes
  • Matt Sutton
  • Rachel Meacock

Abstract

Payments for some diagnostic scans undertaken in outpatient settings were unbundled from Diagnosis Related Group based payments in England in April 2013 to address under‐provision. Unbundled scans attracted additional payments of between £45 and £748 directly following the reform. We examined the effect on utilization of these scans for patients with suspected cancer. We also explored whether any detected effects represented real increases in use of scans or better coding of activity. We applied difference‐in‐differences regression to patient‐level data from Hospital Episodes Statistics for 180 NHS hospital Trusts in England, between April 2010 and March 2018. We also explored heterogeneity in recorded use of scans before and after the unbundling at hospital Trust‐level. Use of scans increased by 0.137 scans per patient following unbundling, a 134% relative increase. This increased annual national provider payments by £79.2 million. Over 15% of scans recorded after the unbundling were at providers that previously recorded no scans, suggesting some of the observed increase in activity reflected previous under‐coding. Hospitals recorded substantial increases in diagnostic imaging for suspected cancer in response to payment unbundling. Results suggest that the reform also encouraged improvements in recording, so the real increase in testing is likely lower than detected.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Hayes & Jonathan Stokes & Matt Sutton & Rachel Meacock, 2024. "How do hospitals respond to payment unbundling for diagnostic imaging of suspected cancer patients?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 823-843, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:33:y:2024:i:5:p:823-843
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4804
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:33:y:2024:i:5:p:823-843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.