IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v7y2017i3p500-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strength varying laws of rock soaked with supercritical CO 2 drilling fluid and the prediction of safe mud weight window

Author

Listed:
  • Baojiang Sun
  • Hongkun Zhang

Abstract

Drilling with supercritical CO 2 (SC‐CO 2 ) is an important new technology in petroleum engineering. The technology has many unique advantages for increasing the penetration rate and reducing formation damage, but it is a disadvantage for the wellbore stability. Therefore, an experimental technique has been developed to determine the safe mud weight window for drilling with SC‐CO 2 . More specifically, a special experimental apparatus has been designed to mimic the in situ temperature and pressure conditions during drilling operations. Different experiments were conducted using core samples soaked in SC‐CO 2 and water‐based and oil‐based drilling fluids, respectively. Once the experimental measurements regressed, an empirical correlation, including time, temperature and pressure factors, was obtained to describe the compressive strength of the SC‐CO 2 ‐soaked core samples. Further modifications were then made to the formulations used to calculate the densities of the drilling fluids at the corresponding burst and collapse pressure, respectively. In addition, the effects of dynamic cohesion, internal friction angle, and tensile strength on the wellbore stability were determined. Compared to the conventional water‐based and oil‐based drilling fluids, the SC‐CO 2 drilling fluid performs better with respect to wellbore stability and has a wider safe mud weight window. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Baojiang Sun & Hongkun Zhang, 2017. "Strength varying laws of rock soaked with supercritical CO 2 drilling fluid and the prediction of safe mud weight window," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 500-511, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:500-511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/ghg.1656
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:7:y:2017:i:3:p:500-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.