IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v12y2022i6p764-783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation study of chemo‐mechanical impacts of CO2 injection in morrow b sandstone reservoir

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Adu‐Gyamfi
  • William Ampomah
  • Jiawei Tu
  • Qian Sun
  • Samuel Erzuah
  • Justice Sarkodie‐Kyeremeh

Abstract

This study investigates the impacts of geomechanical and geochemical changes on carbon storage in a partially depleted oil reservoir, using results from four different coupled simulation models. Models were used to examine the relative importance of storage mechanisms, and how changing reservoir parameters might affect these mechanisms through time. The study uses data from a Morrowan sandstone reservoir in the Farnsworth Unit (FWU), Ochiltree County, Texas which is currently undergoing CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Partially depleted oil reservoirs such as the FWU offer attractive carbon utilization and/or storage targets because of existing infrastructure and economic benefits from incremental oil recovery as well as tax credits. However, prediction of storage capacity or long‐term fluid migration in these fields can be difficult because of the wide variation in formation fluids and operational histories that may have undergone. CO2 injection can cause complex geomechanical and geochemical responses in a reservoir as a result of interplay between dynamic changes in pore pressure, reservoir temperature, fluid composition, and interactions between formation fluids, CO2, and reservoir rock. Thus, multiple coupled numerical simulation models must be developed and used to more precisely understand what CO2 storage mechanisms are most significant, as well as the long‐term fate of the stored CO2. Our study used results from hydrodynamic, coupled hydro‐geomechanical, coupled hydro‐geochemical, and coupled hydro‐geomechanical‐geochemical models to examine how changes in geomechanical and geochemical properties can impact the injectivity or storage capacity of CO2. Models simulated historical field operations and then forward‐modeled a water‐alternate‐gas (WAG) operation for 20 years, followed by a 1000‐year post‐injection monitoring. The work demonstrates that in this specific reservoir, geomechanical impacts appear to be more significant than any geochemical processes, which showed minimal impact on reservoir properties. Furthermore, these simulation scenarios corroborated other studies showing more than 90% of CO2 injected are being stored and will remain stored in the reservoir. The study was able to draw on a rich set of data from this currently operational project for the work. Because the Morrow is a widespread oil‐bearing reservoir in the midcontinent of the United States and is fairly typical of many sandstone reservoirs elsewhere, the study has significance beyond the boundaries of our field area. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Adu‐Gyamfi & William Ampomah & Jiawei Tu & Qian Sun & Samuel Erzuah & Justice Sarkodie‐Kyeremeh, 2022. "Simulation study of chemo‐mechanical impacts of CO2 injection in morrow b sandstone reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 12(6), pages 764-783, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:764-783
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2192
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:12:y:2022:i:6:p:764-783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.