IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emjrnl/v20y2017i1p1-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistent tests for conditional treatment effects

Author

Listed:
  • Yu‐Chin Hsu

Abstract

We construct tests for the null hypothesis that the conditional average treatment effect is non‐negative, conditional on every possible value of a subset of covariates. Testing such a null hypothesis can provide more information than the sign of the average treatment effects parameter. The null hypothesis can be characterized as infinitely many of unconditional moment inequalities. A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test is constructed based on these unconditional moment inequalities, and a simulated critical value is proposed. It is shown that our test can control the size uniformly over a broad set of data‐generating processes asymptotically, that it is consistent against fixed alternatives and that it is unbiased against some N − 1 / 2 local alternatives. Several extensions of our test are also considered and we apply our tests to examine the effect of a job‐training programme on real earnings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu‐Chin Hsu, 2017. "Consistent tests for conditional treatment effects," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:emjrnl:v:20:y:2017:i:1:p:1-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ectj.12077
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna, 2021. "Nonparametric Tests for Treatment Effect Heterogeneity With Duration Outcomes," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 816-832, July.
    2. Shi, Chengchun & Luo, Shikai & Zhu, Hongtu & Song, Rui, 2021. "An online sequential test for qualitative treatment effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112521, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Hsu Yu-Chin & Huber Martin & Lai Tsung-Chih, 2019. "Nonparametric estimation of natural direct and indirect effects based on inverse probability weighting," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Yu‐Chin Hsu & Shu Shen, 2021. "Testing monotonicity of conditional treatment effects under regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 346-366, April.
    5. Hsu, Yu-Chin & Shen, Shu, 2019. "Testing treatment effect heterogeneity in regression discontinuity designs," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 468-486.
    6. Sungwon Lee, 2021. "Partial Identification and Inference for Conditional Distributions of Treatment Effects," Papers 2108.00723, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    7. Yu-Chin Hsu & Martin Huber & Ying-Ying Lee & Chu-An Liu, 2021. "Testing Monotonicity of Mean Potential Outcomes in a Continuous Treatment with High-Dimensional Data," Papers 2106.04237, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    8. Shi, Chengchun & Lu, Wenbin & Song, Rui, 2019. "A sparse random projection-based test for overall qualitative treatment effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102107, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Masahiro Kato, 2024. "Triple/Debiased Lasso for Statistical Inference of Conditional Average Treatment Effects," Papers 2403.03240, arXiv.org.
    10. Sungwon Lee, 2024. "Partial identification and inference for conditional distributions of treatment effects," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 107-127, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C01 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Econometrics
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emjrnl:v:20:y:2017:i:1:p:1-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.