IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/emetrp/v90y2022i4p3-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comment on Jackson and Sonnenschein (2007) “Overcoming Incentive Constraints by Linking Decisions”

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Ball
  • Matthew O. Jackson
  • Deniz Kattwinkel

Abstract

We correct a bound in the definition of approximate truthfulness used in the body of the paper of Jackson and Sonnenschein (2007). The proof of their main theorem uses a different permutation-based definition, implicitly claiming that the permutation-version implies the bound-based version. We show that this claim holds only if the bound is loosened. The new bound is still strong enough to guarantee that the fraction of lies vanishes as the number of problems grows, so the theorem is correct as stated once the bound is loosened.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Ball & Matthew O. Jackson & Deniz Kattwinkel, 2022. "Comment on Jackson and Sonnenschein (2007) “Overcoming Incentive Constraints by Linking Decisions”," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(4), pages 3-7, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:90:y:2022:i:4:p:3-7
    DOI: 10.3982/ECTA20516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA20516
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/ECTA20516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:90:y:2022:i:4:p:3-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.