IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/econjl/v128y2018i609p710-727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrium Coordination with Discretionary Policy Making

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Dennis
  • Tatiana Kirsanova

Abstract

Discretionary policy makers cannot manage private†sector expectations and cannot coordinate the actions of future policy makers. As a consequence, coordination failures can occur and multiple equilibria can arise. In this article, we employ notions of self†enforceability and learnability to motivate and identify equilibria of particular interest in discretionary policy problems exhibiting multiple equilibria. Central among these criteria are whether an equilibrium is robust to the formation of coalitions, and whether it is learnable by private agents and jointly learnable by private agents and the policy maker. Unless the Pareto†preferred equilibrium is learnable by private agents, we find little reason to expect coordination on that equilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Dennis & Tatiana Kirsanova, 2018. "Equilibrium Coordination with Discretionary Policy Making," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(609), pages 710-727, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:econjl:v:128:y:2018:i:609:p:710-727
    DOI: 10.1111/ecoj.12407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecoj.12407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:econjl:v:128:y:2018:i:609:p:710-727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.