IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v36y2019i2p999-1027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Audit Offices Respond to Audit Fee Pressure? Evidence of Increased Focus on Nonaudit Services and their Impact on Audit Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Erik L. Beardsley
  • Dennis R. Lassila
  • Thomas C. Omer

Abstract

We investigate whether audit offices respond to audit fee pressure by increasing their focus on nonaudit services (NAS), as well as the combined effect of audit fee pressure and an increased focus on NAS on audit quality. We find a positive association between audit fee pressure and changes in NAS at the audit office level. We also find increased rates of client misstatement among audit offices that increase focus on NAS in the presence of audit fee pressure compared to audit offices that do not, suggesting a joint effect on audit quality. We find that the reduction in audit quality occurs in large audit offices. Overall, we provide evidence that audit offices’ provision of additional NAS in the presence of fee pressure is an important dimension to consider when examining the effects of declining audit fees on audit quality. Comment les bureaux d'audit réagissent‐ils à la pression sur les honoraires d'audit ? Données relatives à l'importance accrue accordée aux services autres que l'audit et à son incidence sur la qualité de l'audit Les auteurs se demandent si les bureaux d'audit réagissent à la pression sur les honoraires d'audit en accentuant l'importance qu'ils accordent aux services autres que l'audit et se penchent également sur l'incidence conjuguée de la pression sur les honoraires d'audit et de l'importance accrue accordée aux services autres que l'audit sur la qualité de l'audit. Ils notent l'existence d'un lien positif entre la pression sur les honoraires d'audit et les changements au chapitre des services autres que l'audit à l’échelon du bureau d'audit. Les auteurs observent également des proportions plus élevées d'anomalies chez les clients des bureaux d'audit qui accentuent l'importance accordée aux services autres que l'audit, en présence de pression sur les honoraires d'audit, par rapport aux bureaux d'audit qui ne le font pas, ce qui semble indiquer une incidence conjuguée sur la qualité de l'audit. L'analyse révèle qu'une réduction de la qualité de l'audit est observable dans les grands bureaux d'audit. Globalement, les auteurs montrent, preuves à l'appui, que l'offre par les bureaux d'audit de services additionnels non liés à l'audit en présence de pression sur les honoraires d'audit est un aspect du contexte à prendre en considération dans l’étude des répercussions du fléchissement des honoraires d'audit sur la qualité de l'audit.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik L. Beardsley & Dennis R. Lassila & Thomas C. Omer, 2019. "How Do Audit Offices Respond to Audit Fee Pressure? Evidence of Increased Focus on Nonaudit Services and their Impact on Audit Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 999-1027, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:36:y:2019:i:2:p:999-1027
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12440
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrew B. Jackson, 2022. "Residuals from two‐step research designs," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4345-4358, December.
    2. Xinming Liu & Gerald J. Lobo & Hung‐Chao Yu, 2021. "Is Audit Committee Equity Compensation Related to Audit Fees?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 740-769, March.
    3. Beardsley, Erik L. & Imdieke, Andrew J. & Omer, Thomas C., 2021. "The distraction effect of non-audit services on audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2).
    4. Patrick Velte, 2023. "The impact of external auditors on firms’ financial restatements: a review of archival studies and implications for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 959-985, September.
    5. Donelson, Dain C. & Ege, Matthew & Imdieke, Andrew J. & Maksymov, Eldar, 2020. "The revival of large consulting practices at the Big 4 and audit quality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    6. Kristina Peštović & Nikola Milicevic & Nenad Djokic & Ines Djokic, 2021. "Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:36:y:2019:i:2:p:999-1027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.