IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v35y2018i2p622-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spillover Effect of SEC Comment Letters on Qualitative Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from the Risk Factor Disclosure

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen V. Brown
  • Xiaoli (Shaolee) Tian
  • Jennifer Wu Tucker

Abstract

In this study we use the recently mandated risk factor disclosure to examine the spillover effect of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) review of qualitative corporate disclosure. We find that firms not receiving any comment letter (“No‐letter Firms”) modify their subsequent year's disclosures to a larger extent if the SEC has commented on the risk factor disclosure of (i) the industry leader, (ii) a close rival, or (iii) numerous industry peers. We refer to this effect as “spillover.” Further, we find that after SEC comments on the industry leader's disclosure, No‐letter Firms also provide more firm‐specific disclosures in the subsequent year. The increased disclosure specificity reduces these firms’ likelihood of receiving SEC risk disclosure comments on their new filings. Our evidence suggests an indirect effect of the SEC review of qualitative disclosure. Les auteurs utilisent l'information sur les facteurs de risque dont la communication a récemment été rendue obligatoire pour étudier les retombées de l'examen par la SEC de l'information qualitative communiquée par les sociétés. Ils constatent que les sociétés n'ayant reçu aucune lettre de commentaires modifient davantage l'information qu'ils communiquent au sujet de l'exercice subséquent si la SEC a commenté l'information sur les facteurs de risque communiquée par 1) le chef de file du secteur, 2) un proche rival ou 3) plusieurs entreprises comparables du secteur. Ce comportement s'explique par ce que les auteurs appellent les « retombées » des commentaires. Il appert en outre qu'après la formulation par la SEC de commentaires sur l'information communiquée par le chef de file du secteur, les sociétés n'ayant reçu aucune lettre de commentaires livrent également davantage d'information propre à l'entreprise dans l'exercice subséquent. Cette spécificité accrue de l'information communiquée réduit la probabilité que la SEC adresse à ces entreprises des commentaires relatifs à l'information sur les facteurs de risque lors de la production de leurs nouvelles déclarations. Les constats des auteurs semblent indiquer que l'examen par la SEC de l'information qualitative communiquée par les sociétés a des répercussions indirectes.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen V. Brown & Xiaoli (Shaolee) Tian & Jennifer Wu Tucker, 2018. "The Spillover Effect of SEC Comment Letters on Qualitative Corporate Disclosure: Evidence from the Risk Factor Disclosure," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 622-656, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:2:p:622-656
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:2:p:622-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.