IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v35y2018i2p1004-1028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockholder Exit Threats and Financial Reporting Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Yiwei Dou
  • Ole‐Kristian Hope
  • Wayne B. Thomas
  • Youli Zou

Abstract

Recent theoretical and empirical studies suggest that blockholders (shareholders with ownership ≥ 5 percent) exert governance through the threat of exit. Blockholders have strong incentives to gather private information and sell their shares when managers are perceived to underperform. To prevent blockholders from selling their shares and the firm from suffering a stock price decline, managers align their actions with the interests of shareholders. As a result of the greater manager‐shareholder alignment, managers' actions are more likely to be in shareholders' best interest, and consequently there is less need for managers to manipulate earnings. Consistent with these predictions from economic theory, we find evidence that as exit threat increases, firms have higher financial reporting quality. Theory also predicts that the impact of blockholders' exit threat on financial reporting quality (FRQ) should increase as the manager's wealth is tied more closely to the stock price, and this is what we find. Our study contributes to the research on the impact of shareholders on FRQ and to an emerging literature on the impact of blockholders in financial markets. Blockholders play an important role in managers' reporting outcomes through their actions as informed investors. Les récentes études théoriques et empiriques semblent indiquer que les détenteurs de blocs d'actions (soit les actionnaires dont la participation s'établit à au moins 5 pour cent) exercent un pouvoir de gouvernance par l'intermédiaire d'une menace de retrait. Les détenteurs de blocs d'actions sont fortement enclins à colliger de l'information privilégiée et à céder leurs actions lorsqu'ils perçoivent le rendement des gestionnaires comme étant inférieur aux attentes. Pour dissuader les détenteurs de blocs d'actions de se départir de leurs actions et pour prévenir le déclin du cours des actions de l'entreprise, les gestionnaires ajustent leurs décisions aux intérêts des actionnaires. Cet alignement gestionnaires‐actionnaires fait en sorte que les décisions des gestionnaires sont davantage susceptibles d'être favorables aux intérêts des actionnaires, ce qui réduit la nécessité pour les gestionnaires de manipuler les résultats. Conformément à ces prédictions de la théorie économique, les auteurs relèvent des données démontrant qu'une augmentation de la menace de retrait entraîne une hausse de la qualité de l'information financière produite par les sociétés. Selon cette théorie, l'incidence de la menace de retrait des détenteurs de blocs d'actions sur la qualité de l'information financière devrait également augmenter à mesure que se resserre le lien entre la richesse des gestionnaires et le cours de l'action, ce que constatent bel et bien les auteurs. Leur étude contribue aux recherches relatives à l'influence des actionnaires sur la qualité de l'information financière et à la documentation émergente relative à l'incidence du comportement des détenteurs de blocs d'actions sur les marchés financiers. Les détenteurs de blocs d'actions exercent une influence importante sur l'information financière que communiquent les gestionnaires, par l'intermédiaire de leurs décisions en qualité d'investisseurs bien renseignés.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiwei Dou & Ole‐Kristian Hope & Wayne B. Thomas & Youli Zou, 2018. "Blockholder Exit Threats and Financial Reporting Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 1004-1028, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:2:p:1004-1028
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:35:y:2018:i:2:p:1004-1028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.