IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v34y2017i4p1975-2021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Clients’ Enterprise Systems Affect Audit Quality and Efficiency?

Author

Listed:
  • Morton Pincus
  • Feng Tian
  • Patricia Wellmeyer
  • Sean Xin Xu

Abstract

Enterprise systems (ESs) are widely used to support business processes along the enterprise value chain. It has been shown that ESs, by integrating business functions and making information about day†to†day activities available, enhance operational transparency and improve the internal information environment. However, while ES†based business infrastructures can offer many benefits, their prevalence and increased complexity have also brought new challenges to external auditors. Motivated by the prominence of this issue for auditors and regulators and by the scarcity of research jointly examining ESs and auditors’ work, we investigate whether the presence and extent of client firms’ ES implementations are related to the quality and efficiency of auditors’ work. Using proprietary archival data on ES implementations and controlling for self†selection, we find that ES implementation improves the quality and efficiency of current and future years’ audit work. Specifically, there are fewer restatements, a greater likelihood of auditors issuing going†concern opinions to firms that do not survive, higher accruals†based auditing quality, a lower likelihood of Form 10†K filing delays, and generally lower audit fees. We further show that the benefits of ESs generally increase with the scope of implementation and are generally greater when the ES includes accounting and finance systems. Inconsistent with improvement in the quality of auditors’ work, we find no evidence that ESs help auditors identify material weaknesses in advance of restatement announcements and we find that, even in the presence of ESs, auditors issue an excessive number of going†concern opinions to clients that survive.Les systèmes d'entreprise sont abondamment utilisés pour étayer les processus opérationnels qui jalonnent la chaîne de valeur des organisations. Il a été démontré que les systèmes d'entreprise, en intégrant les fonctions de gestion et en donnant accès aux informations relatives aux activités quotidiennes, favorisent la transparence opérationnelle et enrichissent l'environnement de l'information interne. Toutefois, s'il est vrai que les infrastructures de gestion basées sur les systèmes d'entreprise peuvent offrir de nombreux avantages, leur multiplicité et leur complexité accrue ont également soulevé de nouvelles difficultés pour les auditeurs externes. Motivés par l'importance primordiale de cette question pour les auditeurs et les autorités de réglementation et par la rareté des travaux de recherche portant à la fois sur les systèmes d'entreprise et le travail des auditeurs, les auteurs se demandent si l'adoption et l'omniprésence de systèmes d'entreprise dans les sociétés clientes sont liées à la qualité et à l'efficience du travail des auditeurs. En utilisant des données d'archives exclusives sur l'instauration de systèmes d'entreprise et en contrôlant l'autosélection, ils constatent que l'instauration de systèmes d'entreprise améliore la qualité et l'efficience du travail d'audit de l'exercice en cours et des exercices ultérieurs. Ils observent plus précisément que les retraitements sont moins nombreux, que la probabilité que les auditeurs expriment une réserve quant à la continuité de l'exploitation à l’égard de sociétés qui ne survivent pas est plus élevée, que la qualité de l'audit selon les indicateurs liés aux ajustements discrétionnaires est supérieure, que la probabilité de retards dans la production du formulaire 10†K est plus faible et que les honoraires d'audit sont généralement moins élevés. Ils montrent au surplus que les avantages des systèmes d'entreprise s'accentuent en général avec l’étendue de leur mise en place et que ces avantages sont, la plupart du temps, plus importants lorsque les systèmes d'entreprise incluent les systèmes comptables et financiers. En revanche, résultat qui ne cadre pas avec l'amélioration de la qualité du travail des auditeurs, ils ne relèvent aucune donnée qui démontrerait que les systèmes d'entreprise aident les auditeurs à repérer les faiblesses importantes préalablement aux annonces de retraitement et ils constatent que, même en présence de systèmes d'entreprise, les auditeurs expriment un nombre excessif de réserves quant à la continuité de l'exploitation à l’égard de sociétés clientes qui survivent.

Suggested Citation

  • Morton Pincus & Feng Tian & Patricia Wellmeyer & Sean Xin Xu, 2017. "Do Clients’ Enterprise Systems Affect Audit Quality and Efficiency?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(4), pages 1975-2021, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:34:y:2017:i:4:p:1975-2021
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12335
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12335
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12335?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liguang Zhang & Wanyi Chen & Liao Peng, 2023. "The impact of tax enforcement on corporate investment efficiency: evidence from the tax administration information system," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 1635-1669, June.
    2. Ning Jia & Arun Rai & Sean Xin Xu, 2020. "Reducing Capital Market Anomaly: The Role of Information Technology Using an Information Uncertainty Lens," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 979-1001, February.
    3. Xin Chen & Qizhi Dai & Chaohong Na, 2019. "The value of enterprise information systems under different corporate governance aspects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 223-247, December.
    4. Yuming Zhang & Han Liu & Shuang Li & Chao Xing, 2023. "The Digital Transformation Effect in Trade Credit Uptake: The Buyer Perspective," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(7), pages 2056-2078, May.
    5. Kristina Peštović & Nikola Milicevic & Nenad Djokic & Ines Djokic, 2021. "Audit Service Quality Perceived by Customers: Formative Modelling Measurement Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Kocsis, David, 2019. "A conceptual foundation of design and implementation research in accounting information systems," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Lorenzo Dal Maso & Gerald J. Lobo & Francesco Mazzi & Luc Paugam, 2020. "Implications of the Joint Provision of CSR Assurance and Financial Audit for Auditors' Assessment of Going‐Concern Risk†," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 1248-1289, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:34:y:2017:i:4:p:1975-2021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.