IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/coacre/v34y2017i1p118-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Joint Auditor Pair Composition on Audit Quality: Evidence from Impairment Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald J. Lobo
  • Luc Paugam
  • Dana Zhang
  • Jean François Casta

Abstract

Using a sample of firms from France, where the law requires the use of two auditors, we study the effect of auditor pair composition on audit quality by examining a specific account, goodwill impairment. We document that firms audited by a Big 4–non†Big 4 auditor pair (BS) are more likely to book an impairment and book a larger impairment than firms audited by a Big 4–Big 4 auditor pair (BB) when low†performance indicators suggest a greater likelihood of impairment. Moreover, firms audited by a BB pair reduce impairment disclosures when they book impairments, while firms audited by a BS pair do not, suggesting lower transparency for firms audited by a BB pair. Our results inform investors and firms in mandatory joint audit regimes, as well as regulators who are considering requiring joint audits.Les auteurs étudient l'incidence de la composition du collège d'auditeurs sur la qualité de l'audit conjoint en s'intéressant plus particulièrement aux tests de dépréciation de l’écart d'acquisition. L’étude est menée sur un échantillon de sociétés françaises pour lesquelles la réglementation impose un audit conjoint. Les auteurs mettent en évidence que les sociétés auditées par un collège d'auditeurs dont un seul appartient à un cabinet issu des quatre plus grands réseaux mondiaux (collège de type BS) constatent plus fréquemment des dépréciations et comptabilisent des dépréciations plus importantes relativement aux sociétés dont le collège est composé d'auditeurs appartenant tous les deux à un cabinet issu des quatre plus grands réseaux mondiaux (collège de type BB) lorsque des indicateurs de faible performance indiquent une forte probabilité de dépréciation. En outre, les sociétés auditées par un collège de type BB communiquent moins d'informations au sujet des tests de dépréciation que les sociétés auditées par un collège de type BS lorsque les dépréciations sont comptabilisées. Ce résultat indique une moindre transparence des sociétés auditées par un collège de type BB. Les résultats de l’étude informent les investisseurs, les sociétés soumises aux audits conjoints et les autorités de réglementation qui envisagent d'introduire l'audit conjoint.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald J. Lobo & Luc Paugam & Dana Zhang & Jean François Casta, 2017. "The Effect of Joint Auditor Pair Composition on Audit Quality: Evidence from Impairment Tests," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(1), pages 118-153, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:34:y:2017:i:1:p:118-153
    DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12244
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1911-3846.12244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ionela-Corina CHERSAN, 2019. "Audit Quality and Several of Its Determinants," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(153), pages 1-93.
    2. Benjamin T. Albersmann & Reiner Quick, 2020. "The Impact of Audit Quality Indicators on the Timeliness of Goodwill Impairments: Evidence from the German Setting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 56(1), pages 66-103, March.
    3. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    4. Dan Dacian Cuzdriorean, 2018. "Auditing Research: A Review Of Recent Research Advances," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 6(4), pages 14-26.
    5. Andrei Filip & Gerald J. Lobo & Luc Paugam, 2021. "Managerial discretion to delay the recognition of goodwill impairment: The role of enforcement," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1-2), pages 36-69, January.
    6. Mohamed M. El-Dyasty & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Multiple audit mechanism, audit quality and cost of debt: empirical evidence from a developing country," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 264-281, September.
    7. Tarek Abdelfattah & Mohamed Elmahgoub & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2021. "Female Audit Partners and Extended Audit Reporting: UK Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 177-197, November.
    8. Mihai Carp & Costel Istrate, 2021. "Audit Quality under Influences of Audit Firm and Auditee Characteristics: Evidence from the Romanian Regulated Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Johannes Thesing & Patrick Velte, 2021. "Do fair value measurements affect accounting-based earnings quality? A literature review with a focus on corporate governance as moderator," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(7), pages 965-1004, September.
    10. d'Arcy, Anne & Tarca, Ann, 2018. "Reviewing IFRS Goodwill Accounting Research: Implementation Effects and Cross-Country Differences," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 203-226.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:coacre:v:34:y:2017:i:1:p:118-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1911-3846 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.