IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v17y2021i3ne1160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PROTOCOL: The effectiveness of social protection interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map

Author

Listed:
  • Latha Thimmappa
  • Ashrita Saran
  • Sonia R. B. D'Souza
  • Binil V.

Abstract

This evidence and gap map will provide an overview of the existing systematic reviews and impact evaluations on the key outcome domains and interventions aimed at improving social protection among people living in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). The specific objectives of this map are to: (1) Develop a clear framework of types of interventions and outcomes related to the effectiveness of interventions on social protection for people in LMICs. (2) Map available systematic reviews and primary studies on the effectiveness of interventions on social protection for people in LMICs. (3) Provide a structured and accessible collection of existing evidence and identifying gaps in the available evidence on social protection intervention, thereby helping to inform the research agendas of funders and other organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Latha Thimmappa & Ashrita Saran & Sonia R. B. D'Souza & Binil V., 2021. "PROTOCOL: The effectiveness of social protection interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:17:y:2021:i:3:n:e1160
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1160
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesse M Cunha & Giacomo De Giorgi & Seema Jayachandran, 2019. "The Price Effects of Cash Versus In-Kind Transfers," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(1), pages 240-281.
    2. Andrews, Colin & Das, Maitreyi & Elder, John & Ovadiya, Mirey & Zampaglione, Giuseppe, 2012. "Social protection in low income countries and fragile situations : challenges and future directions," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 67607, The World Bank.
    3. Ethan M.J. Lieber & Lee M. Lockwood, 2013. "Costs and Benefits of In-Kind Transfers: The Case of Medicaid Home Care Benefits," Working Papers wp294, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
    4. repec:ilo:ilowps:366683 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    6. Cueto, Begoña & Patricia, Suárez, 2014. "A review of active and passive labour market policies in Spain," MPRA Paper 60648, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. World Bank, 2012. "Resilience, Equity, and Opportunity [Capacidad de recuperación, equidad y oportunidades]," World Bank Publications - Reports 12648, The World Bank Group.
    8. Ethan M. J. Lieber & Lee M. Lockwood, 2019. "Targeting with In-Kind Transfers: Evidence from Medicaid Home Care," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(4), pages 1461-1485, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Niklas Luft & Paula Wallmeyer & Karolina Barglowski & Lisa Bonfert, 2022. "‘Finding My Own Way’: Mobilization of Cultural Capital through Migrant Organizations in Germany," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miller, Stephen M. & Neanidis, Kyriakos C., 2015. "Demographic transition and economic welfare: The role of in-cash and in-kind transfers," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 84-92.
    2. Diego Jimenez-Hernandez & Enrique Seira, 2022. "Should the government sell you goods? Evidence from the milk market in Mexico," Working Paper Series WP 2023-19, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    3. Norma B. Coe & Jing Guo & R. Tamara Konetzka & Courtney Harold Van Houtven, 2019. "What is the marginal benefit of payment‐induced family care? Impact on Medicaid spending and health of care recipients," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 678-692, May.
    4. Zeckhauser, Richard, 2021. "Strategic sorting: the role of ordeals in health care," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 64-81, March.
    5. Christian P R Schmid & Nicolas Schreiner & Alois Stutzer, 2022. "Transfer Payment Systems and Financial Distress: Insights from Health Insurance Premium Subsidies," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(5), pages 1829-1858.
    6. Lucie Gadenne & Samuel Norris & Monica Singhal & Sandip Sukhtankar, 2021. "In-Kind Transfers as Insurance," NBER Working Papers 28507, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. repec:nam:befdwp:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Campa, Pamela & Muehlenbachs, Lucija, 2021. "Addressing Environmental Justice through In-Kind Court Settlements," CEPR Discussion Papers 16293, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Hare Krisna Kundo & Martin Brueckner & Rochelle Spencer & John Davis, 2021. "Mainstreaming climate adaptation into social protection: The issues yet to be addressed," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 953-974, August.
    10. Jakub Grossmann & Filip Pertold & Michal Šoltés, 2023. "Parental Allowance Increase and Labor Supply: Evidence from a Czech Reform," CESifo Working Paper Series 10367, CESifo.
    11. Amitabh Chandra & Courtney Coile & Corina Mommaerts, 2023. "What Can Economics Say about Alzheimer's Disease?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 428-470, June.
    12. Aleksandrova, Mariya, 2019. "Social protection as a tool to address slow onset climate events: Emerging issues for research and policy," IDOS Discussion Papers 16/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. Takanori Ida & Takunori Ishihara & Koichiro Ito & Daido Kido & Toru Kitagawa & Shosei Sakaguchi & Shusaku Sasaki, 2022. "Choosing Who Chooses: Selection-Driven Targeting in Energy Rebate Programs," NBER Working Papers 30469, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Takanori Ida & Takunori Ishihara & Koichiro Ito & Daido Kido & Toru Kitagawa & Shosei Sakaguchi & Shusaku Sasaki, 2021. "Paternalism, Autonomy, or Both? Experimental Evidence from Energy Saving Programs," Papers 2112.09850, arXiv.org.
    15. de Bresser, Jochem & Knoef, Marike & van Ooijen, Raun, 2021. "Preferences for In-Kind and In-Cash Home Care Insurance," Discussion Paper 2021-033, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Maria Polyakova & Stephen P. Ryan, 2019. "Subsidy Targeting with Market Power," NBER Working Papers 26367, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Lutz Leisering, 2020. "The Calls for Universal Social Protection by International Organizations: Constructing a New Global Consensus," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 90-102.
    18. Bénédicte Fonteneau & Jan Van Ongevalle, 2015. "Redistributive Social Protection. Mapping Study," BeFinD Working Papers 0101, University of Namur, Department of Economics.
    19. Marta Lachowska & Isaac Sorkin & Stephen A. Woodbury, 2022. "Firms and Unemployment Insurance Take-up," NBER Working Papers 30266, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Aalok Ranjan Chaurasia, 2022. "An Index to Measure Progress Towards Universal Social Protection with Application to India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 16(1), pages 34-54, April.
    21. Abhijit Banerjee & Rema Hanna & Benjamin A Olken & Elan Satriawan & Sudarno Sumarto, "undated". "Food vs. Food Stamps: Evidence from an At-Scale Experiment in Indonesia," Working Papers 2373, Publications Department.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:17:y:2021:i:3:n:e1160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.