IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/camsys/v15y2019i4ne1058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: A systematic review and individual participant data network meta‐analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian A. Welch
  • Elizabeth Ghogomu
  • Alomgir Hossain
  • Alison Riddle
  • Michelle Gaffey
  • Paul Arora
  • Omar Dewidar
  • Rehana Salam
  • Simon Cousens
  • Robert Black
  • T. Déirdre Hollingsworth
  • Sue Horton
  • Peter Tugwell
  • Donald Bundy
  • Mary Christine Castro
  • Alison Elliott
  • Henrik Friis
  • Huong T. Le
  • Chengfang Liu
  • Emily K. Rousham
  • Fabian Rohner
  • Charles King
  • Erliyani Sartono
  • Taniawati Supali
  • Peter Steinmann
  • Emily Webb
  • Franck Wieringa
  • Pattanee Winnichagoon
  • Maria Yazdanbakhsh
  • Zulfiqar A. Bhutta
  • George Wells

Abstract

Background Soil transmitted (or intestinal) helminths and schistosomes affect millions of children worldwide. Objectives To use individual participant data network meta‐analysis (NMA) to explore the effects of different types and frequency of deworming drugs on anaemia, cognition and growth across potential effect modifiers. Search Methods We developed a search strategy with an information scientist to search MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Econlit, Internet Documents in Economics Access Service (IDEAS), Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Social Services Abstracts, Global Health CABI and CAB Abstracts up to March 27, 2018. We also searched grey literature, websites, contacted authors and screened references of relevant systematic reviews. Selection Criteria We included randomised and quasirandomised deworming trials in children for deworming compared to placebo or other interventions with data on baseline infection. Data Collection and Analysis We conducted NMA with individual participant data (IPD), using a frequentist approach for random‐effects NMA. The covariates were: age, sex, weight, height, haemoglobin and infection intensity. The effect estimate chosen was the mean difference for the continuous outcome of interest. Results We received data from 19 randomized controlled trials with 31,945 participants. Overall risk of bias was low. There were no statistically significant subgroup effects across any of the potential effect modifiers. However, analyses showed that there may be greater effects on weight for moderate to heavily infected children (very low certainty evidence). Authors' Conclusions This analysis reinforces the case against mass deworming at a population‐level, finding little effect on nutritional status or cognition. However, children with heavier intensity infections may benefit more. We urge the global community to adopt calls to make data available in open repositories to facilitate IPD analyses such as this, which aim to assess effects for the most vulnerable individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian A. Welch & Elizabeth Ghogomu & Alomgir Hossain & Alison Riddle & Michelle Gaffey & Paul Arora & Omar Dewidar & Rehana Salam & Simon Cousens & Robert Black & T. Déirdre Hollingsworth & Sue Horto, 2019. "Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: A systematic review and individual participant data network meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:15:y:2019:i:4:n:e1058
    DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1058
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/cl2.1058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vivian Welch & Elizabeth Ghogomu & Alomgir Hossain & Paul Arora & Simon Cousens & Michelle Gaffey & Alison Riddle & Rehana Salam & Peter Tugwell & Zulfiqar Bhutta & George A Wells & Advisory Group: Ro, 2018. "PROTOCOL: Mass deworming for improving health and cognition of children in endemic helminth areas: a systematic review and individual participant data network meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 1-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:camsys:v:15:y:2019:i:4:n:e1058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1891-1803 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.