IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apsmda/v8y1992i1p17-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of stress‐strength reliability based on tail‐modelling

Author

Listed:
  • G. R. Dargahi‐Noubary

Abstract

In probabilistic design it is common to use parametric statistical models to calculate the probability of failure (Pf) obtained from stress‐strength interference theory. In this respect, it is well known that Pf is sensitive to the shape of the upper and lower tails of the stress and strength distributions respectively and also to their interference. If the true shapes of these tails could be discovered, it would be possible to improve the existing techniques. However, in practice there is seldom sufficient real data available to establish these tails with statistical significance. Moreover, often one or both variables are expensive to sample. Thus a separate tail estimation may not always be possible. Motivated to define a theoretical safety factor, the author presents a method here which provides a general solution to the problem by considering the tail estimation for a sample of increased sized. This is obtained by a reformulation of the problem in terms of excesses over a threshold, and by breaking the analysis into two parts; estimation of the number of exceedances and modelling the excesses. The analysis is carried out by non‐parametric estimation of the former and parametric modelling of the latter based on data from the critical region.

Suggested Citation

  • G. R. Dargahi‐Noubary, 1992. "Estimation of stress‐strength reliability based on tail‐modelling," Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 17-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apsmda:v:8:y:1992:i:1:p:17-24
    DOI: 10.1002/asm.3150080104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asm.3150080104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asm.3150080104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apsmda:v:8:y:1992:i:1:p:17-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0747 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.