IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v7y1991i3p187-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pesticide residues in food: The delaney clause and global harmonization of pesticide standards

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander R. Nemajovsky

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, The University of Georgia, Athens)

  • Terence J. Centner

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, The University of Georgia, Athens)

Abstract

Phytosanitary regulations as barriers to international trade and their infringement upon the objectives of the General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade has proven to be a troublesome issue. Phytosanitary regulations governing pesticide residues pursuant to a US federal legislative provision known as the Delaney Clause may constitute barriers to trade. The policy of a zero tolerance level for carcinogens in certain foods may preclude acceptance of Codex Alimentarius limits, although the two systems of regulation are not inconsistent in themselves. This article analyzes the Delaney Clause and a recent modification to Delaney that gives the US an additional policy basis from which to seek a global harmonization of pesticide standards. Such a harmonization could perhaps best be accomplished through the Codex Alimentarius system using the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade as the mechanism for implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander R. Nemajovsky & Terence J. Centner, 1991. "Pesticide residues in food: The delaney clause and global harmonization of pesticide standards," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(3), pages 187-196.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:7:y:1991:i:3:p:187-196
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6297(199105)7:3<187::AID-AGR2720070302>3.0.CO;2-J
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:7:y:1991:i:3:p:187-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.