IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wfo/monber/y2004i9p697-707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bedeutung und Effekte der öffentlichen Sportförderung

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver Fritz
  • Margit Schratzenstaller
  • Egon Smeral

    (WIFO)

  • Erich Thöni

Abstract

Eingriffe der öffentlichen Hand im Bereich des Sports können mit dem zusätzlichen gesamtwirtschaftlichen Nutzen legitimiert werden, der sowohl mit der aktiven Ausübung als auch dem passiven Konsum von Sport verbunden ist. Sportausübung wirkt sich positiv auf den Gesundheitszustand der Bevölkerung und damit auf Produktivität und Wachstum aus. Wettkampfveranstaltungen sind mit positiven externen Effekten für die Tourismuswirtschaft verbunden, die in empirischen Studien nachgewiesen werden können. Diese gesamtwirtschaftlichen Externalitäten, aber auch Informationsdefizite sowie verteilungspolitische Probleme können jedoch zur Folge haben, dass der private Sektor nicht genügend zur Finanzierung des Sports beiträgt bzw. dass zu wenig Sport ausgeübt wird.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver Fritz & Margit Schratzenstaller & Egon Smeral & Erich Thöni, 2004. "Bedeutung und Effekte der öffentlichen Sportförderung," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 77(9), pages 697-707, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2004:i:9:p:697-707
    Note: With English abstract.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/25256
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Büch, Martin-Peter & Maennig, Wolfgang & Schulke, Hans-Jürgen (ed.), 2012. "Sport und Sportgroßveranstaltungen in Europa - zwischen Zentralstaat und Regionen," Edition HWWI, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI), volume 4, number 4.
    2. Christine Mayrhuber & Michaela Neumayr & Margit Schratzenstaller & Birgit Buchinger & Ulrike Gschwandtner, 2006. "Gender-Budget-Analyse für Oberösterreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 27105, February.
    3. Pamela Wicker & Bernd Frick, 2020. "Sustainable Financing of Elite Athlete Development: An Empirical Analysis of Winter Sports in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Thomas J. Lampoltshammer & Heidrun Maurer & Nike Pulda & Peter Klimek & Jan Hurt & Ursula Rosenbichler, 2023. "Challenges toward Evidence-Based Policymaking Using Agent-Based Modeling for Federal Sports Grants: A Self-Reflection from a Transdisciplinary Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-34, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2004:i:9:p:697-707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.