IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/stintr/v23y2022i3p79-94n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polish inequality statistics reconsidered: are the poor really that poor?

Author

Listed:
  • Szulc Adam

    (Warsaw School of Economics, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Poland .)

Abstract

In the present study income inequality in Poland is evaluated using corrected income data to provide more reliable estimates. According to most empirical studies based on household surveys and considering the European standards, the recent income inequality in Poland is moderate and decreased significantly after reaching its peaks during the first decade of the 21st century. These findings were challenged by Brzeziński et al. (2022), who placed Polish income inequality among the highest in Europe. Such a conclusion was possible when combining the household survey data with information on personal income tax. In the present study the above-mentioned findings are further explored using 2014 and 2015 data and employing additional corrections to the household survey incomes. Incomes of the poorest people are replaced by their predictions made on a large set of well-being correlates, using the hierarchical correlation reconstruction. Applying this method together with the corrections based on Brzeziński’s et al. results reduces the 2014 and 2015 revised Gini indices, still keeping them above the values obtained with the use of the survey data only. It seems that the hierarchical correlation reconstruction offers more accurate proxies to the actual low incomes, while matching tax data provides better proxies to the top incomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Szulc Adam, 2022. "Polish inequality statistics reconsidered: are the poor really that poor?," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 23(3), pages 79-94, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:23:y:2022:i:3:p:79-94:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/stattrans-2022-0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/stattrans-2022-0031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/stattrans-2022-0031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:23:y:2022:i:3:p:79-94:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.