IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/stintr/v23y2022i1p75-88n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New improved Poisson and negative binomial item count techniques for eliciting truthful answers to sensitive questions

Author

Listed:
  • Kowalczyk Barbara

    (SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, Poland .)

  • Wieczorkowski Robert

    (Statistics Poland, Programming and Coordination of Statistical Surveys Department, Poland .)

Abstract

Item count techniques (ICTs) are indirect survey questioning methods designed to deal with sensitive features. These techniques have gained the support of many applied researchers and undergone further theoretical development. Latterly in the literature, two new item count methods, called Poisson and negative binomial ICTs, have been proposed. However, if the population parameters of the control variable are not provided by the outside source, the methods are not very efficient. Efficiency is an important issue in indirect methods of questioning due to the fact that the protection of respondents’ privacy is usually achieved at the expense of the efficiency of the estimation. In the present paper we propose new improved Poisson and negative binomial ICTs, in which two control variables are used in both groups, although in a different manner. In the paper we analyse best linear unbiased and maximum likelihood estimators of the proportion of the sensitive attribute in the population in the introduced new models. The theoretical findings presented in the paper are supported by a comprehensive simulation study. The improved procedure allowed the increase of the efficiency of the estimation compared to the original Poisson and negative binomial ICTs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kowalczyk Barbara & Wieczorkowski Robert, 2022. "New improved Poisson and negative binomial item count techniques for eliciting truthful answers to sensitive questions," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 75-88, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:75-88:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/stattrans-2022-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/stattrans-2022-0005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/stattrans-2022-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:stintr:v:23:y:2022:i:1:p:75-88:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.