IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/sthioe/v38y2020i1p163-181n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

British Land Policies in the Gold Coast and Her Relations with Asante

Author

Listed:
  • Adu-Gyamfi Samuel
  • Bempong Emmanuel
  • Yartey Henry Tettey
  • Darkwa Benjamin Dompreh

    (Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology,Kwame)

Abstract

Colonization successfully advanced various reforms in Africa that affected several practices on the continent. The various customs that have been affected include the land tenure system of British colonies in particular. An abundance of laws and policies were adopted with the sole aim of conserving the environment. These policies often clashed with indigenous interests and witnessed counter attacks as a result. Despite this, there is little information in the literature concerning how British land policies shaped their relations with the indigenous people, particularly the Asante. Based on a qualitative research approach, the current study uses Asante as a focal point of discourse in order to historically trace British land policies and how they, the British engaged with the people of Asante. From the discourse, it should be established that the colonial administration passed ordinances to mobilize revenue and not necessarily for the protection of the environment. In addition, the findings indicated that the boom in cash crops, such as cocoa and rubber, prompted Britain to reform the land tenure system. With the land policies, individuals and private organizations could acquire lands from local authorities for the cultivation of cash crops. We conclude that the quest to control land distribution caused the British to further annex Asante.

Suggested Citation

  • Adu-Gyamfi Samuel & Bempong Emmanuel & Yartey Henry Tettey & Darkwa Benjamin Dompreh, 2020. "British Land Policies in the Gold Coast and Her Relations with Asante," Studia Historiae Oeconomicae, Sciendo, vol. 38(1), pages 163-181, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:sthioe:v:38:y:2020:i:1:p:163-181:n:7
    DOI: 10.2478/sho-2020-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/sho-2020-0007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/sho-2020-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:sthioe:v:38:y:2020:i:1:p:163-181:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.