IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/spotou/v19y2012i2p151-154n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Competences of Physical Education Students. Unified Versus Two-Tier University Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Buchta Krystyna

    (Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, 21-500 Biała Podlaska, Poland, 2 Akademicka St.)

Abstract

Introduction. The objective of the study was a comparative analysis of the results of unified and two-tier university studies in physical education at the Faculty of Physical Education and Sport in Biała Podlaska of the University of Physical Education in Warsaw. Material and methods. The study utilized 128 full-time final semester students. The study utilized a diagnostic poll and random survey method. On the basis of respondents' opinions, the following results were analyzed: respondents' expectations regarding their education and the level of their fulfilment, forms of activities undertaken during studies, professional plans and opinions regarding the course of studies in PE. Results. The analysis revealed that, when making the decision to study physical education, respondents expected to gain directional competences and knowledge and skills enabling further education. Respondents highly regarded the level of these competences gained. The majority of respondents expressed a wish to find employment in the education sector and other institutions of physical education. Conclusion. The result of the research indicated that transforming unified Master's studies into two-tier university studies did not bring about fundamental changes in the outcome of studies in physical education.

Suggested Citation

  • Buchta Krystyna, 2012. "The Competences of Physical Education Students. Unified Versus Two-Tier University Studies," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 151-154, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:spotou:v:19:y:2012:i:2:p:151-154:n:7
    DOI: 10.2478/v10197-012-0015-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10197-012-0015-0
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/v10197-012-0015-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:spotou:v:19:y:2012:i:2:p:151-154:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.