IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/socchr/v9y2011i1p17-40n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women Victims of Domestic Violence: Analysis of Their Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Antal Imola
  • Szigeti Júlia
  • Stoleru Maria

    (Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Social Work, 128-130 21 Decembrie 1989 Bld., 400604 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Criminal justice interventions are important to reduce domestic violence and protect women. In this study we will tackle the unwillingness of women in two regions of Romania to press charges and the failure of the criminal justice system in providing them protection and justice. “Why don’t women press charges?” was the main question that stood at the basis of the international research WOSAFEJUS1, where Babeş-Bolyai University (UBB) was the main Romanian partner through its Faculty of Sociology and Social Work. In our paper we will analyse the studies relevant to the field of domestic violence and we will pay a special attention to those that take into consideration the functioning of the criminal justice system. We will present a preliminary analysis of the women’s perception of the criminal justice system in Romania. Our results are based on 76 semi-structured interviews with women in a situation of domestic violence. Atlas.ti was used to aid a thematic analysis of the qualitative data. The results will highlight women’s expectations regarding the justice system, the perceived usefulness of the legal intervention as well as the main factors that come into play when they decide to stay or to leave the criminal justice process. Even though in most of the cases police intervention can’t or doesn’t provide safety and the rapid elimination of danger, the importance of non-legislative factors of intervention has nevertheless been emphasized.

Suggested Citation

  • Antal Imola & Szigeti Júlia & Stoleru Maria, 2011. "Women Victims of Domestic Violence: Analysis of Their Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System in Romania," Social Change Review, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 17-40, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:socchr:v:9:y:2011:i:1:p:17-40:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/scr-2016-0015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2016-0015
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/scr-2016-0015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johnson, Ida M., 2007. "Victims' perceptions of police response to domestic violence incidents," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 498-510.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin Bolger, P. & Walters, Glenn D., 2019. "The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people's willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 93-99.
    2. Manisha Joshi & Susan B. Sorenson, 2010. "Intimate Partner Violence at the Scene: Incident Characteristics and Implications for Public Health Surveillance," Evaluation Review, , vol. 34(2), pages 116-136, April.
    3. Shoshana Gander-Zaucker & Gemma L. Unwin & Michael Larkin, 2022. "The Feasibility and Acceptability of an Experience-Based Co-Design Approach to Reducing Domestic Abuse," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Jenny Richards & Janet Smithson & Nicholas J. Moberly & Alicia Smith, 2021. "“If It Goes Horribly Wrong the Whole World Descends on You”: The Influence of Fear, Vulnerability, and Powerlessness on Police Officers’ Response to Victims of Head Injury in Domestic Violence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:socchr:v:9:y:2011:i:1:p:17-40:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.