IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/organi/v46y2013i5p175-185n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competency Management in Central Europe: A Comparison of Czech, Hungarian and Slovenian Competency Needs

Author

Listed:
  • Mühlbacher Jürgen

    (WU - Vienna University of Economics and Business, Institute for Change Management and Management Development, Welthandelplatz 1, A-1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Kovač Jure

    (University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kidričeva cesta 55a, 4000 Kranj, Slovenia)

  • Novotny Adam

    (Eszterházy Károly College, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Eszterházy tér 1, 3300 Eger, Hungary)

  • Putnová Anna

    (University of Technology Brno, Faculty of Business and Management, Kolejní 2906/4, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

After a strong focus on transition processes in Central East European countries (CEE), this topic has been displaced by more dramatic merger and reorganization processes or the recent financial crisis. This obscures the fact that we know almost nothing about the management competencies in these countries, which is an important building or stumbling block for future development. Therefore, we will examine the individual competencies of almost 300 top and middle managers in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovenia, and we will compare the different sets of competencies and interpret them according to the given economic situation in these countries

Suggested Citation

  • Mühlbacher Jürgen & Kovač Jure & Novotny Adam & Putnová Anna, 2013. "Competency Management in Central Europe: A Comparison of Czech, Hungarian and Slovenian Competency Needs," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 46(5), pages 175-185, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:46:y:2013:i:5:p:175-185:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/orga-2013-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2013-0019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/orga-2013-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stor Marzena & Kupczyk Teresa, 2015. "Differences in Competency Management – Comparative Analysis between Polish, Spanish, and Austrian Business Practices," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(2), pages 49-74, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:46:y:2013:i:5:p:175-185:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.