IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v32y2016i1p231-256n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synthetic Multiple-Imputation Procedure for Multistage Complex Samples

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou Hanzhi

    (Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA.)

  • Elliott Michael R.
  • Raghunathan Trivellore E.

    (Dept. of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI USA 48109; Survey Methodology Program, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.)

Abstract

Multiple imputation (MI) is commonly used when item-level missing data are present. However, MI requires that survey design information be built into the imputation models. For multistage stratified clustered designs, this requires dummy variables to represent strata as well as primary sampling units (PSUs) nested within each stratum in the imputation model. Such a modeling strategy is not only operationally burdensome but also inferentially inefficient when there are many strata in the sample design. Complexity only increases when sampling weights need to be modeled. This article develops a generalpurpose analytic strategy for population inference from complex sample designs with item-level missingness. In a simulation study, the proposed procedures demonstrate efficient estimation and good coverage properties. We also consider an application to accommodate missing body mass index (BMI) data in the analysis of BMI percentiles using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III data. We argue that the proposed methods offer an easy-to-implement solution to problems that are not well-handled by current MI techniques. Note that, while the proposed method borrows from the MI framework to develop its inferential methods, it is not designed as an alternative strategy to release multiply imputed datasets for complex sample design data, but rather as an analytic strategy in and of itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou Hanzhi & Elliott Michael R. & Raghunathan Trivellore E., 2016. "Synthetic Multiple-Imputation Procedure for Multistage Complex Samples," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 231-256, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:231-256:n:11
    DOI: 10.1515/jos-2016-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jos-2016-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Yuan & Roderick J. A. Little, 2007. "Parametric and Semiparametric Model-Based Estimates of the Finite Population Mean for Two-Stage Cluster Samples with Item Nonresponse," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1172-1180, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jouni Kuha & Myrsini Katsikatsou & Irini Moustaki, 2018. "Latent variable modelling with non‐ignorable item non‐response: multigroup response propensity models for cross‐national analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 1169-1192, October.
    2. Nuanpan Lawson & Chris Skinner, 2017. "Estimation of a cluster-level regression model under nonresponse within clusters," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 75(3), pages 319-331, December.
    3. Kim, Gi-Soo & Paik, Myunghee Cho & Kim, Hongsoo, 2017. "Causal inference with observational data under cluster-specific non-ignorable assignment mechanism," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 88-99.
    4. Ying Yuan & Roderick J. A. Little, 2009. "Meta-Analysis of Studies with Missing Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(2), pages 487-496, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:231-256:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.