IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v32y2016i1p129-145n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Discussion of Weighting Procedures for Unit Nonresponse

Author

Listed:
  • Haziza David

    (Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Centre-ville Montreal Quebec H3C 3J7 Canada.)

  • Lesage Éric

    (INSEE, 18 bd Adolphe Pinard 75 014 Paris, France.)

Abstract

Weighting procedures are commonly applied in surveys to compensate for nonsampling errors such as nonresponse errors and coverage errors. Two types of weight-adjustment procedures are commonly used in the context of unit nonresponse: (i) nonresponse propensity weighting followed by calibration, also known as the two-step approach and (ii) nonresponse calibration weighting, also known as the one-step approach. In this article, we discuss both approaches and warn against the potential pitfalls of the one-step procedure. Results from a simulation study, evaluating the properties of several point estimators, are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Haziza David & Lesage Éric, 2016. "A Discussion of Weighting Procedures for Unit Nonresponse," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(1), pages 129-145, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:129-145:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/jos-2016-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jos-2016-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:mpr:mprres:4937 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:mpr:mprres:4780 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:32:y:2016:i:1:p:129-145:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.