IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v9y2016i1p135-166n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effective Legal Protection against the Excessive Length of Administrative Decision-Making: The Cases of Slovenia and Croatia

Author

Listed:
  • Sever Tina
  • Đanić Ana
  • Kovać Polonca

    (Tina Sever, PhD, Teaching Assistant; Polonca Kovač, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Ana Đanić, Teaching Assistant, J. J. Strossmayer University, Faculty of Law, Osijek, Croatia.)

Abstract

In administrative matters, the parties usually have a right of access to the court and to a fair trial within a reasonable time limit, as defined by constitutions, only after the exhaustion of appeals. Judicial review is performed in a majority of states by a specialised administrative court in accordance with Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Based on a comparative research analysis of supranational and national normative law and European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law, this paper provides insight into the extent to which administrative matters can be reviewed in administrative disputes as well as into the legal remedies available to the parties, especially when the authorities violate time limits, focusing on the compliance of the regulation in Slovenia and Croatia with the ECHR standards. The paper also illustrates a comparative perspective of regulation in other European countries, namely Austria and Estonia. Our findings show the importance of the awareness of the necessary interplay between acts on administrative procedure and acts on administrative disputes for an effective realisation of the parties’ rights and the public interest, with administrative justice ensuring a safety net by guaranteeing an effective legal remedy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sever Tina & Đanić Ana & Kovać Polonca, 2016. "Effective Legal Protection against the Excessive Length of Administrative Decision-Making: The Cases of Slovenia and Croatia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 135-166, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:135-166:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/nispa-2016-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/nispa-2016-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/nispa-2016-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Dubois & Christel Schurrer & Marco Velicogna, 2013. "The functioning of judicial systems and the situation of the economy in the European Union Member States," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01291386, HAL.
    2. Eric Dubois & Christel Schurrer & Marco Velicogna, 2013. "The functioning of judicial systems and the situation of the economy in the European Union Member States," Working Papers hal-01291386, HAL.
    3. Tina Sever & Iztok Rakar & Polonca Kovac, 2014. "Protecting Human Rights through Fundamental Principles of Administrative Procedures in Eastern Europe," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 4, pages 249-275, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arruñada, Benito, 2018. "Evolving practice in land demarcation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 661-675.
    2. Marek M. Kaminski, 2018. "Spoiler effects in proportional representation systems: evidence from eight Polish parliamentary elections, 1991–2015," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 441-460, September.
    3. Kovač Polonca, 2016. "Openness and Transparency in (Slovene) Administrative Procedures as Fundamental European Principles," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 49-67, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:135-166:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.