IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/njopap/v14y2021i1p261-283n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Pisár Peter
  • Ďurčeková Ina

    (Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University in Banska Bystrica, Slovak Republic.)

  • Křápek Milan

    (AMBIS, a.s. Prague, Czech Republic.)

Abstract

Effective public support of innovations, research and development represents one of the priorities of the European Union (EU). The aim of this paper was to examine the effectiveness of one such public programme – public support for business innovation from EU funds in Slovakia – by using selected quasi-experimental design methods on the example of the Operational Programme Competitiveness and Economic Growth for the programming period 2007 – 2013. The value added of this paper is the fact that we use the method proposed and used by the European Commission and Slovak national authorities. The “difference-in-differences” method is used to compare the changes in value added of supported firms before and after the intervention in comparison to firms that did not receive support. The results suggest that the public support from selected calls of the evaluated operational programme was effective and delivered improvements not only in the field of innovativeness and competitiveness, but also in the area of employment. The evaluated call was much more effective compared to other calls of the programme evaluated by other authors. The responses from the management body suggest that the core success factors were the contents of the call and timing.

Suggested Citation

  • Pisár Peter & Ďurčeková Ina & Křápek Milan, 2021. "Effectiveness of Public Support for Business Innovation from EU Funds: Case Study in Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 261-283, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:261-283:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2021-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/nispa-2021-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:njopap:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:261-283:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.