IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/morgsr/v81y2019i1p73-86n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principle Differences between B2B and B2C Marketing Communication Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Rėklaitis Kęstutis

    (MA, sales manager at Axis Industries. Kulautuvos str. 45A, Kaunas, LT-47190, Lithuania. Phone: +370 37 360234.)

  • Pilelienė Lina

    (PhD, professor at Vytautas Magnus University, Faculty of Economics and Management, S. Daukanto str. 28, Kaunas, LT-44246, Lithuania. Phone: +370 37 327856.)

Abstract

The scientific problem analysed in the article focuses on identifying the differences in the marketing communication process in a framework of business-to-consumer and business-to-business markets. The results show that although it may seem that the process itself is the same in both situations, however, it has many differences as well as many aspects in common.

Suggested Citation

  • Rėklaitis Kęstutis & Pilelienė Lina, 2019. "Principle Differences between B2B and B2C Marketing Communication Processes," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 81(1), pages 73-86, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:morgsr:v:81:y:2019:i:1:p:73-86:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/mosr-2019-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mosr-2019-0005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mosr-2019-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Key, Thomas Martin & Czaplewski, Andrew J., 2017. "Upstream social marketing strategy: An integrated marketing communications approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 325-333.
    2. DURALIA Oana, 2018. "Integrated Marketing Communication And Its Impact On Consumer Behavior," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 13(2), pages 92-102, August.
    3. František Milichovský, 2013. "New Tools for Effective Marketing Communications," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, vol. 16(1), pages 35-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Václav Kupec & Michal Lukáč & Peter Štarchoň & Gabriela Pajtinková Bartáková, 2020. "Audit of Museum Marketing Communication in the Modern Management Context," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Ana-Maria Urdea & Cristinel Petrișor Constantin, 2021. "Experts’ Perspective on the Development of Experiential Marketing Strategy: Implementation Steps, Benefits, and Challenges," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Mihaela Tofan & Ionel Bostan, 2022. "Some Implications of the Development of E-Commerce on EU Tax Regulations," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikita Moiseev & Alexey Mikhaylov & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2023. "Market capitalization shock effects on open innovation models in e-commerce: golden cut q-rung orthopair fuzzy multicriteria decision-making analysis," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Prarawan Senachai & Jakaphun Julsrigival & Raksmey Sann, 2022. "Social Marketing Strategy to Promote Traditional Thai Medicines during COVID-19: KAP and DoI Two-Step Theory Application Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Grzegorz Wesołowski, 2021. "The Effect of Using Social Media in the Modern Marketing Communication on the Shaping an External Employer’s Image," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    4. Suhail Ahmad Bhat & Mushtaq Ahmad Darzi & Iqbal Ahmad Hakim, 2019. "Understanding Social Marketing and Well-being: A Review of Selective Databases," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 44(2), pages 75-87, June.
    5. Chi-Horng Liao, 2020. "Evaluating the Social Marketing Success Criteria in Health Promotion: A F-DEMATEL Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Mercy Wanjiru Ngundo & Wanjiku Ng’ang’a Kinyanju & Julius Kahuthia Mwangi, 2020. "Marketing Strategies, Competitive Strategies and Organization Performance of Media Houses in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(7), pages 177-186, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:morgsr:v:81:y:2019:i:1:p:73-86:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.