IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mancon/v6y2023i1p37-48n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Jokes Can Tell: A Top 5 of Ethical Transgressions in Consulting

Author

Listed:
  • Bouwmeester Onno

    (Durham University Business School & Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam)

Abstract

In studies on consultant ethics clients are usually portrayed as their potential victims. However, in newspapers a different story can be found, when journalists report cased where clients and consultants have been partners in crime. To better map the common ethical transgressions in consulting, this study presents a top five based on interviews with consultants. In addition, the study illustrates these common transgressions with public jokes, found on the internet. The findings show how clients are not the only, and certainly not the most vulnerable stakeholder. Client interests are relatively well acknowledged in consultancies’ codes of conduct, and much more so than for example those of client staff, or junior consultants. This study contributes to consultant practice by emphasizing how consultant ethics should acknowledge more stakeholders than only clients. Likewise, it flags the issue of consultant independence, as it is consultants second most reported ethical challenge. The study contributes to the business ethics literature by demonstrating the illustrative value of business jokes in pointing at common ethical transgression, complementary to the less common and more severe cases journalists report about.

Suggested Citation

  • Bouwmeester Onno, 2023. "What Jokes Can Tell: A Top 5 of Ethical Transgressions in Consulting," Management Consulting Journal, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 37-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mancon:v:6:y:2023:i:1:p:37-48:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/mcj-2023-0005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/mcj-2023-0005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/mcj-2023-0005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mancon:v:6:y:2023:i:1:p:37-48:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.