IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/jfaccp/v1y2021i2p29-47n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forensic Accounting vs Fraud examination: Roles, Importance and Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Tekavčič Metka

    (School of Business and Economics, University of Ljubljana)

  • Damijan Sandra

    (School of Business and Economics, University of Ljubljana)

Abstract

Fraud has existed throughout history. Yet, it is estimated that today's occurrence has a huge impact on global revenues, highlighting the importance of fraud examination and forensic accounting. Although the roles of the two disciplines appear to be similar (e.g. litigation support), they differ significantly in their objectives, with the goal of fraud auditing being to determine whether fraud has occurred and, if so, who is responsible. Forensic accounting has the additional objective of assessing the financial consequences and determining whether the allegations have a factual basis by analyzing the financial evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Tekavčič Metka & Damijan Sandra, 2021. "Forensic Accounting vs Fraud examination: Roles, Importance and Differences," Journal of Forensic Accounting Profession, Sciendo, vol. 1(2), pages 29-47, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:jfaccp:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:29-47:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/jfap-2021-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jfap-2021-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jfap-2021-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark E. Lokanan, 2015. "Challenges to the fraud triangle: Questions on its usefulness," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 201-224, September.
    2. Niamh Brennan, 2014. "Forensic Accounting in a Constitutional Parliamentary Democracy: The Case of Ireland," Open Access publications 10197/6211, Research Repository, University College Dublin.
    3. Ozili, Peterson K, 2015. "Forensic Accounting and Fraud: A Review of Literature and Policy Implications," MPRA Paper 77236, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozili, Peterson K, 2020. "Forensic accounting theory," MPRA Paper 102566, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. K. Ozili Peterson, 2016. "Fraud Detection, Conservatism and Political Economy of Whistle Blowing," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 5, November.
    3. Xin Xu & Feng Xiong & Zhe An, 2023. "Using Machine Learning to Predict Corporate Fraud: Evidence Based on the GONE Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 137-158, August.
    4. Monica Ramos Montesdeoca & Agustín J. Sánchez Medina & Felix Blázquez Santana, 2019. "Research Topics in Accounting Fraud in the 21st Century: A State of the Art," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.
    5. Mark E. Lokanan & Prerna Sharma, 2023. "Two Decades of Accounting Fraud Research: The Missing Meso-Level Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    6. Mikhail Gorodilov A. & Natalya Shklyaeva A. & Михаил Городилов Анатольевич & Наталья Шкляева Андреевна, 2018. "Форензик в рамках экспертно-аналитической и аудиторской деятельности: теоретическое исследование понятия // Forensic within the Framework of Expert-Analytical and Auditing Activities: Theoretical Rese," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 5(2), pages 72-79.
    7. Madzivire E.T & Nyamwanza L & Mushonga W & Takachicha M. T & Mulonda D, 2020. "An Investigation on the Effectiveness of Forensic Audit as a Tool for Fraud Detection and Prevention," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 49-67.
    8. Intiyas Utami & Yosephine Widwining Astiti & Nafsiah Mohamed, 2019. "Fraud Intention and Machiavellianism: An Experimental Study of Fraud Triangle," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 269-279, August.
    9. Ozili, Peterson K, 2018. "Advances and Issues in Fraud Research: A Commentary," MPRA Paper 84879, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Hengky Latan & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, 2019. "‘Whistleblowing Triangle’: Framework and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 189-204, November.
    11. Waseem Yousaf & Raheel Jamil, 2020. "Does Moral Intensity Affect the Whistleblowing Intentions?," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(2), pages 84-99, December.
    12. Paulina Roszkowska & Domènec Melé, 2021. "Organizational Factors in the Individual Ethical Behaviour. The Notion of the “Organizational Moral Structure”," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 187-209, July.
    13. Jeanette Akkeren & Sherrena Buckby, 2017. "Perceptions on the Causes of Individual and Fraudulent Co-offending: Views of Forensic Accountants," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 383-404, December.
    14. Saffet A. Uygur & Christopher J. Napier, 2024. "Understanding Fraud in the Not-For-Profit Sector: A Stakeholder Perspective for Charities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(3), pages 569-588, March.
    15. Ghio, Alessandro & McGuigan, Nicholas & Powell, Lisa, 2023. "The Queering Accounting Manifesto," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Hideaki Sakawa & Naoki Watanabel, 2022. "Accounting Frauds and Main-Bank Monitoring in Japanese Corporations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 605-621, October.
    17. Hegazy, Sarah & Sangster, Alan & Kotb, Amr, 2017. "Mapping forensic accounting in the UK," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 43-56.
    18. Roberto Tommasetti & Rodrigo de Oliveira Leite & Vinicius Mothé Maia & Marcelo Alvaro da Silva Macedo, 2021. "Revisiting the Accounting Fraud Components: A Bottom-Up Approach Using the Twitter Platform," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    19. Domènec Melé & Josep M. Rosanas & Joan Fontrodona, 2017. "Ethics in Finance and Accounting: Editorial Introduction," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(4), pages 609-613, February.
    20. Rabeea Sadaf & Judit Oláh & József Popp & Domicián Máté, 2018. "An Investigation of the Influence of the Worldwide Governance and Competitiveness on Accounting Fraud Cases: A Cross-Country Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:jfaccp:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:29-47:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.