IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/erapso/v15y2022i25p25-33n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholders’ Involvement and Orphans’ Comfortability with Residential Placement Options in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Ojo Olubukola Olakunbi
  • Akintomide Akinjide Gabriel

    (Department of Educational Foundations and Counselling, Faculty of Education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

  • Afolabi Monsurat Mojirayo

    (Centre for Gender and Social Policy Studies, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

  • Ekundayo Opeyemi Oyewunmi
  • Babalola Oyeyemi Bukola

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife)

  • Aliyu Taofeek Kolawole

    (Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife)

  • Salami Joshua Olayemi

    (Institute of Education, Faculty of Education, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

Abstract

Nigerian orphans face a range of challenges, including finding a suitable place to live, having to choose who to live with and this choice is influenced by various factors. This study determined the proportion of orphans’ resident in orphanages and family settings in selected states in Nigeria. It also assessed stakeholder’s input into placement option decision for orphans. The study examined orphans’ comfortability with residential placement and living with caregivers. The issues related to non-comfortability of orphans with residential placement were also investigated. The study employed the descriptive survey research design. The population for the study comprised all orphans in formal care (orphanages) and informal care (family settings) in Nigeria. A multistage sample procedure was employed. Five states were selected purposively in Nigeria. Indices such as poverty, high rates of insurgencies and HIV/AIDs were used in states’ selection. A sample of 1,475 in orphanages and 2,418 in family settings were selected for the study making a total of 3,893 orphans. Data was from a larger study on Needs and Vulnerability of Orphans in Orphanages and family settings in Nigeria. Questionnaire for Needs and Vulnerability of Orphans in Orphanages and Family settings in Nigeria was used to elicit information from the respondents. Data collected were analyzed using frequency distribution and percentages. The results showed that more orphans live in family settings (2,418) and orphans residing in both orphanages (30.5%) and family settings (44.2%) are staying there based on the decisions of relatives. As perceived by the orphans, (88.5%) in orphanages and (71.1%) in family settings are comfortable where they are living and (77.6%) in orphanages and (72.3%) in the family settings perceived that they are comfortable living with their caregivers. Finally, it was found out that most prominent of the issues related to the residential placement of orphans in the family settings were poor living conditions (49.7%) and access to resources (48.2%), while orphans in orphanages felt challenged with strict caregivers (46.2%) and lack of access to recreational facilities (16.2%). Based on the findings, it was suggested that families within the communities and stakeholders should support family members who are saddled with the responsibility of caring for orphans. It was also recommended that staffing patterns in orphanages should be restructured to enhance caregivers’ capacity to provide children with stable, warm, and consistent relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Ojo Olubukola Olakunbi & Akintomide Akinjide Gabriel & Afolabi Monsurat Mojirayo & Ekundayo Opeyemi Oyewunmi & Babalola Oyeyemi Bukola & Aliyu Taofeek Kolawole & Salami Joshua Olayemi, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Involvement and Orphans’ Comfortability with Residential Placement Options in Nigeria," European Review of Applied Sociology, Sciendo, vol. 15(25), pages 25-33, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:erapso:v:15:y:2022:i:25:p:25-33:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/eras-2022-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/eras-2022-0008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/eras-2022-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:erapso:v:15:y:2022:i:25:p:25-33:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.