IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecoman/v16y2024i1p104-113n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the technological structure of the work programme of construction companies

Author

Listed:
  • Ginevičius Romualdas

    (1 Faculty of Public Governance and Business, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities Street 20 08303, Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

The commercial performance of a construction company (CC) largely depends on the planned work programme. The annual CC work programme is a set of objects of a specific purpose and structure (a building system). The programme has the following characteristics: first, the number of objects; second, the construction technologies provided for in the projects (fully prefabricated, monolithic, brick, etc.); third, the variation of work scopes among objects; and fourth, the construction technology. These CC work programme features are interrelated, i.e., aligned with each other, forming the technological structure (TS) of the CC work programme. Once these attributes were formalised, four partial indicators were obtained: the first assesses the variation in construction objects’ sizes; the second — their number; the third — the number of applied technologies; and the fourth — the technologies. The importance of these indicators was assessed to combine them into an indicator of the technological structure of the annual CC work programme. Its quantitative assessment has scientific and practical importance, providing an opportunity to analyse its impact on the results of commercial activities, to improve the organisational management structure of the company, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Ginevičius Romualdas, 2024. "Evaluation of the technological structure of the work programme of construction companies," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 104-113, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:104-113:n:8
    DOI: 10.2478/emj-2024-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2024-0008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/emj-2024-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:104-113:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.